Textmagic vs Kannel

Struggling to choose between Textmagic and Kannel? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Textmagic is a Social & Communications solution with tags like sms, messaging, texting, cloudbased, api.

It boasts features such as Send and receive SMS messages, Bulk SMS messaging, Two-way SMS conversations, SMS templates, MMS picture messaging, SMS analytics and reports, Phone number provisioning, API and integrations, Conversation workflows and pros including Easy to use interface, Scalable SMS sending, Flexible pricing plans, Good deliverability rates, Rich features for marketing and notifications, Wide coverage with local numbers globally, Good API and integrations.

On the other hand, Kannel is a Network & Admin product tagged with wap, sms, gateway, messaging.

Its standout features include SMS gateway functionality, Support for multiple protocols (SMPP, UCP/EMI, CIMD2, OIS, HTTP), Built-in SMSC (Short Message Service Center) functionality, Support for long SMS messages, Tools for parsing, validating, encoding SMS messages, APIs for integrating with external apps and services, Load balancing and redundancy capabilities, Support for SMS over SS7 and SIGTRAN networks, Tools for SMS routing, filtering, throttling, Support for SMSC emulation and interconnecting, Tools for monitoring, statistics, troubleshooting, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, High performance and scalability, Support for many protocols and interfaces, Flexible and customizable, Active development community, Modular architecture, Reliable and stable, Wide protocol support, Easy integration.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Textmagic

Textmagic

Textmagic is a cloud-based SMS messaging platform that allows users to send and receive text messages using a web interface or APIs. It provides phone numbers in 90+ countries and easy integration with business systems for transactional and marketing SMS.

Categories:
sms messaging texting cloudbased api

Textmagic Features

  1. Send and receive SMS messages
  2. Bulk SMS messaging
  3. Two-way SMS conversations
  4. SMS templates
  5. MMS picture messaging
  6. SMS analytics and reports
  7. Phone number provisioning
  8. API and integrations
  9. Conversation workflows

Pricing

  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Easy to use interface

Scalable SMS sending

Flexible pricing plans

Good deliverability rates

Rich features for marketing and notifications

Wide coverage with local numbers globally

Good API and integrations

Cons

Can get expensive for high volumes

Limited flexibility in custom workflows

No native mobile apps

Lacks more advanced analytics


Kannel

Kannel

Kannel is an open source WAP and SMS gateway that enables sending and receiving SMS messages to/from various devices and interfaces with various messaging protocols. It allows building SMS services and applications quickly and efficiently.

Categories:
wap sms gateway messaging

Kannel Features

  1. SMS gateway functionality
  2. Support for multiple protocols (SMPP, UCP/EMI, CIMD2, OIS, HTTP)
  3. Built-in SMSC (Short Message Service Center) functionality
  4. Support for long SMS messages
  5. Tools for parsing, validating, encoding SMS messages
  6. APIs for integrating with external apps and services
  7. Load balancing and redundancy capabilities
  8. Support for SMS over SS7 and SIGTRAN networks
  9. Tools for SMS routing, filtering, throttling
  10. Support for SMSC emulation and interconnecting
  11. Tools for monitoring, statistics, troubleshooting

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

High performance and scalability

Support for many protocols and interfaces

Flexible and customizable

Active development community

Modular architecture

Reliable and stable

Wide protocol support

Easy integration

Cons

Complex configuration

Steep learning curve

Limited built-in web interface

Need for expertise in telecom protocols

Not ideal for non-technical users