Struggling to choose between The Economist and Public Library of Science? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
The Economist is a News & Books solution with tags like news, business, politics, economics, current-events.
It boasts features such as Weekly magazine with news and analysis, Articles on global politics, business, finance, science and technology, Audio editions of print magazine articles, Daily briefings on global news developments, Access to archive of past magazine issues and pros including In-depth, well-researched articles, Balanced, unbiased perspective, Succinct, engaging writing style, Useful audio feature for busy readers, Comprehensive archive of past content.
On the other hand, Public Library of Science is a News & Books product tagged with science, research, open-access, publishing.
Its standout features include Open access scientific journals, All works published under Creative Commons Attribution License, Journals cover broad range of scientific disciplines, Online submission and peer review system, Indexing in major scientific databases, and it shines with pros like Free to access for readers, Authors retain copyright, Rapid publication times, Rigorous peer review, High visibility and discoverability.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
The Economist is a weekly news and business magazine that offers insightful analysis on global news, politics, business, finance, technology and culture. Known for its trustworthy reporting and concise writing style.
The Public Library of Science (PLOS) is an open access scientific publishing project aimed at creating open access scientific journals and other products to make research freely available to anyone.