Tsuru vs Kubero

Struggling to choose between Tsuru and Kubero? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Tsuru is a Development solution with tags like open-source, cloud, paas, application-deployment.

It boasts features such as Open source PaaS software, Allows deploying apps without infrastructure complexity, Supports multiple languages like Python, Node.js, Go, Ruby, etc, Automatic scaling of apps, Resource isolation between apps, Built-in support for HTTP load balancing, Plugin system for extending functionality, CLI and dashboard for management, Integrates with Docker and Kubernetes and pros including Free and open source, Simple and easy to use, Good for deploying apps quickly, Active community support, Highly scalable and reliable.

On the other hand, Kubero is a Network & Admin product tagged with kubernetes, container, orchestration, opensource.

Its standout features include Graphical user interface for managing Kubernetes clusters, Cluster management - create, edit, upgrade and delete clusters, Resource management - deploy, monitor and manage Kubernetes resources, RBAC management - create users, roles and role bindings, Helm chart management - deploy and manage applications via Helm, Audit logging - view all user and system actions, Multi-cluster management - manage multiple clusters from a single UI, and it shines with pros like Intuitive dashboard simplifies Kubernetes management, No need to use command line for common tasks, Role-based access control for managing user permissions, Support for multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters, Active community and frequent updates.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Tsuru

Tsuru

Tsuru is an open source Platform as a Service (PaaS) software that allows users to deploy and manage applications without the complexity of building and maintaining the infrastructure typically associated with developing and launching an app.

Categories:
open-source cloud paas application-deployment

Tsuru Features

  1. Open source PaaS software
  2. Allows deploying apps without infrastructure complexity
  3. Supports multiple languages like Python, Node.js, Go, Ruby, etc
  4. Automatic scaling of apps
  5. Resource isolation between apps
  6. Built-in support for HTTP load balancing
  7. Plugin system for extending functionality
  8. CLI and dashboard for management
  9. Integrates with Docker and Kubernetes

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Simple and easy to use

Good for deploying apps quickly

Active community support

Highly scalable and reliable

Cons

Limited documentation

Not as feature rich as proprietary PaaS

Requires some DevOps knowledge

Not ideal for complex or legacy apps


Kubero

Kubero

Kubero is an open-source Kubernetes management platform that provides a user-friendly GUI to manage Kubernetes clusters, resources, users, roles and more. It simplifies Kubernetes with an intuitive dashboard for visibility and control.

Categories:
kubernetes container orchestration opensource

Kubero Features

  1. Graphical user interface for managing Kubernetes clusters
  2. Cluster management - create, edit, upgrade and delete clusters
  3. Resource management - deploy, monitor and manage Kubernetes resources
  4. RBAC management - create users, roles and role bindings
  5. Helm chart management - deploy and manage applications via Helm
  6. Audit logging - view all user and system actions
  7. Multi-cluster management - manage multiple clusters from a single UI

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Intuitive dashboard simplifies Kubernetes management

No need to use command line for common tasks

Role-based access control for managing user permissions

Support for multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters

Active community and frequent updates

Cons

Less flexibility than using kubectl directly

Limited metrics and monitoring capabilities

No official enterprise support offered

Less mature than some commercial alternatives