uPort vs OneName

Struggling to choose between uPort and OneName? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

uPort is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like identity, blockchain, cryptography, selfsovereign.

It boasts features such as Self-sovereign digital identity, Cryptographic signing of transactions, Key and data management, Selective disclosure of identity attributes, Integration with Ethereum blockchain and pros including User ownership and control over identity, No centralized authority or third party needed, Improved privacy and security, Interoperability with other systems, Free and open source.

On the other hand, OneName is a Security & Privacy product tagged with identity-management, access-management, single-signon, multifactor-authentication.

Its standout features include Single sign-on, Multi-factor authentication, Identity lifecycle management, Access management, Audit logs, and it shines with pros like Enhanced security, Increased productivity, Simplified access, Reduced IT costs.

Feature	uPort	OneName
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

uPort

Description: uPort is a self-sovereign identity and key management system that allows users to control their own identities and data. It uses blockchain and cryptography to give users ownership over their digital identity.

OneName

Description: OneName is an identity and access management solution that allows users to securely access multiple applications with a single login. It provides multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and identity lifecycle management.

Key Features Comparison

uPort Features

• Self-sovereign digital identity
• Cryptographic signing of transactions
• Key and data management
• Selective disclosure of identity attributes
• Integration with Ethereum blockchain

OneName Features

• Single sign-on
• Multi-factor authentication
• Identity lifecycle management
• Access management
• Audit logs

Pros & Cons Analysis

uPort

Pros

• User ownership and control over identity
• No centralized authority or third party needed
• Improved privacy and security
• Interoperability with other systems
• Free and open source

Cons

• Requires some technical knowledge to use
• Limited adoption so far
• Relies on Ethereum which has scaling challenges

OneName

Pros

• Enhanced security
• Increased productivity
• Simplified access
• Reduced IT costs

Cons

• Complex setup
• Ongoing maintenance
• Vendor lock-in
• Cost

Pricing Comparison

uPort

• Open Source

OneName

• Subscription-Based