Uptime Kuma vs AppBeat

Struggling to choose between Uptime Kuma and AppBeat? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Uptime Kuma is a Network & Admin solution with tags like uptime, monitoring, selfhosted, alerts.

It boasts features such as Website monitoring, SSL certificate monitoring, Ping monitoring, Port monitoring, Keyword monitoring, Heartbeat monitoring, Cronjob monitoring and pros including Open source and self-hosted, Easy to install and use, Good notification support, Good uptime tracking, Customizable monitors.

On the other hand, AppBeat is a Development product tagged with monitoring, performance, mobile, web, optimization.

Its standout features include Real-time performance monitoring, Crash reporting, User behavior analytics, Network request tracking, Error monitoring, Custom metrics and events, Alerting and notifications, and it shines with pros like Easy to set up and integrate, Good for monitoring hybrid apps, Flexible custom metrics, Good value for money.

Feature	Uptime Kuma	AppBeat
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

Uptime Kuma

Description: Uptime Kuma is an open source self-hosted monitoring tool that allows you to monitor your websites and applications from your own server. It checks that your services are up and sends you alerts if they go down.

AppBeat

Description: AppBeat is an application performance monitoring and management tool that helps developers optimize mobile and web apps. It monitors app performance, user experience, crashes, network requests, and more in real-time.

Key Features Comparison

Uptime Kuma Features

• Website monitoring
• SSL certificate monitoring
• Ping monitoring
• Port monitoring
• Keyword monitoring
• Heartbeat monitoring
• Cronjob monitoring

AppBeat Features

• Real-time performance monitoring
• Crash reporting
• User behavior analytics
• Network request tracking
• Error monitoring
• Custom metrics and events
• Alerting and notifications

Pros & Cons Analysis

Uptime Kuma

Pros

• Open source and self-hosted
• Easy to install and use
• Good notification support
• Good uptime tracking
• Customizable monitors

Cons

• Limited built-in reports
• No mobile app
• Less flexible than paid options

AppBeat

Pros

• Easy to set up and integrate
• Good for monitoring hybrid apps
• Flexible custom metrics
• Good value for money

Cons

• Can get expensive for large teams
• Limited support for native mobile SDKs
• Steep learning curve

Pricing Comparison

Uptime Kuma

• Open Source

AppBeat

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based