Uptime Kuma vs Upzilla

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Uptime Kuma icon
Uptime Kuma
Upzilla icon
Upzilla

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Uptime Kuma and Upzilla? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Uptime Kuma is a Network & Admin solution with tags like uptime, monitoring, selfhosted, alerts.

It boasts features such as Website monitoring, SSL certificate monitoring, Ping monitoring, Port monitoring, Keyword monitoring, Heartbeat monitoring, Cronjob monitoring and pros including Open source and self-hosted, Easy to install and use, Good notification support, Good uptime tracking, Customizable monitors.

On the other hand, Upzilla is a Development product tagged with opensource, crowdsourced, defect-tracking, bugzilla-alternative, customizable, voting, attachments, due-dates, custom-fields.

Its standout features include Web-based interface, Customizable fields and workflows, Voting on issues, Attachments, Due dates, Email notifications, Access control and permissions, Reporting and dashboards, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to install and configure, Good for small to midsize teams, More lightweight than Bugzilla, Customizable without coding, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Uptime Kuma and Upzilla?

When evaluating Uptime Kuma versus Upzilla, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Uptime Kuma and Upzilla have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include uptime, monitoring, selfhosted.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Uptime Kuma and Upzilla significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include uptime, monitoring, selfhosted, alerts.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include uptime, monitoring and opensource, crowdsourced.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Uptime Kuma and Upzilla. You might also explore uptime, monitoring, selfhosted for alternative approaches.

Feature Uptime Kuma Upzilla
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma

Description: Uptime Kuma is an open source self-hosted monitoring tool that allows you to monitor your websites and applications from your own server. It checks that your services are up and sends you alerts if they go down.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Upzilla
Upzilla

Description: Upzilla is an open-source crowdsourced alternative to Bugzilla, a defect tracking system. It allows teams to track software bugs and issues during development. Upzilla is web-based, customizable, and offers features like voting, attachments, due dates, and custom fields.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Features
  • Website monitoring
  • SSL certificate monitoring
  • Ping monitoring
  • Port monitoring
  • Keyword monitoring
  • Heartbeat monitoring
  • Cronjob monitoring
Upzilla
Upzilla Features
  • Web-based interface
  • Customizable fields and workflows
  • Voting on issues
  • Attachments
  • Due dates
  • Email notifications
  • Access control and permissions
  • Reporting and dashboards

Pros & Cons Analysis

Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma
Pros
  • Open source and self-hosted
  • Easy to install and use
  • Good notification support
  • Good uptime tracking
  • Customizable monitors
Cons
  • Limited built-in reports
  • No mobile app
  • Less flexible than paid options
Upzilla
Upzilla
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Easy to install and configure
  • Good for small to midsize teams
  • More lightweight than Bugzilla
  • Customizable without coding
  • Active community support
Cons
  • Less features than Bugzilla
  • Not ideal for large enterprises
  • Limited integration options
  • Basic permissions model
  • Mobile access needs improvement

Pricing Comparison

Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma
  • Open Source
Upzilla
Upzilla
  • Open Source
  • Free

Get More Information

Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma
Learn More About Uptime Kuma
Upzilla
Upzilla
Upzilla
Learn More About Upzilla

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Find what fits. Forget the rest.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal