Uptime Kuma vs WebGazer

Struggling to choose between Uptime Kuma and WebGazer? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Uptime Kuma is a Network & Admin solution with tags like uptime, monitoring, selfhosted, alerts.

It boasts features such as Website monitoring, SSL certificate monitoring, Ping monitoring, Port monitoring, Keyword monitoring, Heartbeat monitoring, Cronjob monitoring and pros including Open source and self-hosted, Easy to install and use, Good notification support, Good uptime tracking, Customizable monitors.

On the other hand, WebGazer is a Ai Tools & Services product tagged with eye-tracking, webcam, gaze-estimation, open-source.

Its standout features include Uses webcam and computer vision algorithms to track eye gaze, Works directly in browser using JavaScript, Open source and customizable, Tracks gaze coordinates and eye movements, Can be integrated into web apps for gaze interaction, and it shines with pros like Low cost - uses existing webcam instead of dedicated eye tracker, Easy to set up and use, Platform independent - works on any device with a webcam, Good for basic gaze tracking applications, Customizable open source code.

Feature	Uptime Kuma	WebGazer
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Ai Tools & Services

Product Overview

Uptime Kuma

Description: Uptime Kuma is an open source self-hosted monitoring tool that allows you to monitor your websites and applications from your own server. It checks that your services are up and sends you alerts if they go down.

WebGazer

Description: WebGazer is an open-source web-based eye tracking software that uses common webcams to infer eye gaze locations on screen. It allows basic gaze interaction functionality for webpages without requiring specialized eye tracking hardware.

Key Features Comparison

Uptime Kuma Features

• Website monitoring
• SSL certificate monitoring
• Ping monitoring
• Port monitoring
• Keyword monitoring
• Heartbeat monitoring
• Cronjob monitoring

WebGazer Features

• Uses webcam and computer vision algorithms to track eye gaze
• Works directly in browser using JavaScript
• Open source and customizable
• Tracks gaze coordinates and eye movements
• Can be integrated into web apps for gaze interaction

Pros & Cons Analysis

Uptime Kuma

Pros

• Open source and self-hosted
• Easy to install and use
• Good notification support
• Good uptime tracking
• Customizable monitors

Cons

• Limited built-in reports
• No mobile app
• Less flexible than paid options

WebGazer

Pros

• Low cost - uses existing webcam instead of dedicated eye tracker
• Easy to set up and use
• Platform independent - works on any device with a webcam
• Good for basic gaze tracking applications
• Customizable open source code

Cons

• Lower accuracy than commercial eye trackers
• Requires user calibration
• Limited functionality compared to full eye tracking software
• Only estimates gaze direction, no pupil tracking
• Sensitive to lighting conditions and user movement

Pricing Comparison

Uptime Kuma

• Open Source

WebGazer

• Open Source