VerneMQ vs emqtt

Struggling to choose between VerneMQ and emqtt? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

VerneMQ is a Network & Admin solution with tags like mqtt, broker, messaging, iot, erlang.

It boasts features such as Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support, QOS 0, 1 and 2 support, SSL/TLS support, Websockets support, Clustering for high availability, Pluggable authentication and authorization, Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers, Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads, Plugin architecture to extend functionality, High performance and low memory footprint and pros including Open source and free to use, High performance and scalability, Built-in clustering for high availability, Supports latest MQTT protocol versions, Easy to deploy and configure, Active community support.

On the other hand, emqtt is a Network & Admin product tagged with mqtt, iot, messaging, broker.

Its standout features include Distributed server cluster, MQTT v3.1/3.1.1/5.0 protocol support, QOS0/1/2 publish-subscribe support , Persistent message queue, Retained messages, Last Will messages, WebSocket and STOMP support, Bridge to other MQTT brokers, Plugin support for authentication and authorization, Enterprise-grade security, and it shines with pros like High performance and scalability, Open source with active community, Supports wide range of platforms, Easy to deploy and configure, Built-in clustering and redundancy, Supports bridging to other protocols, Extensible through plugins.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

VerneMQ

VerneMQ

VerneMQ is an open-source, high-performance MQTT messaging broker written in Erlang. It is scalable, fault-tolerant and easy to set up. VerneMQ can handle thousands of MQTT clients on a single server instance.

Categories:
mqtt broker messaging iot erlang

VerneMQ Features

  1. Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support
  2. QOS 0, 1 and 2 support
  3. SSL/TLS support
  4. Websockets support
  5. Clustering for high availability
  6. Pluggable authentication and authorization
  7. Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers
  8. Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads
  9. Plugin architecture to extend functionality
  10. High performance and low memory footprint

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free to use

High performance and scalability

Built-in clustering for high availability

Supports latest MQTT protocol versions

Easy to deploy and configure

Active community support

Cons

Limited user management capabilities

Not as feature rich as some commercial options

Limited documentation and guides

No graphical user interface

Steep learning curve for some advanced features


emqtt

emqtt

emqtt is an open-source, scalable, distributed MQTT message broker that supports a wide range of network transport protocols. It is written in Erlang/OTP and provides features such as persistent sessions, queueing, clustering, bridges and enterprise-grade security.

Categories:
mqtt iot messaging broker

Emqtt Features

  1. Distributed server cluster
  2. MQTT v3.1/3.1.1/5.0 protocol support
  3. QOS0/1/2 publish-subscribe support
  4. Persistent message queue
  5. Retained messages
  6. Last Will messages
  7. WebSocket and STOMP support
  8. Bridge to other MQTT brokers
  9. Plugin support for authentication and authorization
  10. Enterprise-grade security

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free
  • Custom Pricing

Pros

High performance and scalability

Open source with active community

Supports wide range of platforms

Easy to deploy and configure

Built-in clustering and redundancy

Supports bridging to other protocols

Extensible through plugins

Cons

Limited user management features

No graphical user interface

Steep learning curve for configuration

Requires expertise with Erlang/OTP

Not ideal for small scale deployments