VerneMQ vs emqtt

Struggling to choose between VerneMQ and emqtt? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

VerneMQ is a Network & Admin solution with tags like mqtt, broker, messaging, iot, erlang.

It boasts features such as Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support, QOS 0, 1 and 2 support, SSL/TLS support, Websockets support, Clustering for high availability, Pluggable authentication and authorization, Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers, Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads, Plugin architecture to extend functionality, High performance and low memory footprint and pros including Open source and free to use, High performance and scalability, Built-in clustering for high availability, Supports latest MQTT protocol versions, Easy to deploy and configure, Active community support.

On the other hand, emqtt is a Network & Admin product tagged with mqtt, iot, messaging, broker.

Its standout features include Distributed server cluster, MQTT v3.1/3.1.1/5.0 protocol support, QOS0/1/2 publish-subscribe support , Persistent message queue, Retained messages, Last Will messages, WebSocket and STOMP support, Bridge to other MQTT brokers, Plugin support for authentication and authorization, Enterprise-grade security, and it shines with pros like High performance and scalability, Open source with active community, Supports wide range of platforms, Easy to deploy and configure, Built-in clustering and redundancy, Supports bridging to other protocols, Extensible through plugins.

Feature	VerneMQ	emqtt
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

VerneMQ

Description: VerneMQ is an open-source, high-performance MQTT messaging broker written in Erlang. It is scalable, fault-tolerant and easy to set up. VerneMQ can handle thousands of MQTT clients on a single server instance.

emqtt

Description: emqtt is an open-source, scalable, distributed MQTT message broker that supports a wide range of network transport protocols. It is written in Erlang/OTP and provides features such as persistent sessions, queueing, clustering, bridges and enterprise-grade security.

Key Features Comparison

VerneMQ Features

• Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support
• QOS 0, 1 and 2 support
• SSL/TLS support
• Websockets support
• Clustering for high availability
• Pluggable authentication and authorization
• Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers
• Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads
• Plugin architecture to extend functionality
• High performance and low memory footprint

emqtt Features

• Distributed server cluster
• MQTT v3.1/3.1.1/5.0 protocol support
• QOS0/1/2 publish-subscribe support
• Persistent message queue
• Retained messages
• Last Will messages
• WebSocket and STOMP support
• Bridge to other MQTT brokers
• Plugin support for authentication and authorization
• Enterprise-grade security

Pros & Cons Analysis

VerneMQ

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• High performance and scalability
• Built-in clustering for high availability
• Supports latest MQTT protocol versions
• Easy to deploy and configure
• Active community support

Cons

• Limited user management capabilities
• Not as feature rich as some commercial options
• Limited documentation and guides
• No graphical user interface
• Steep learning curve for some advanced features

emqtt

Pros

• High performance and scalability
• Open source with active community
• Supports wide range of platforms
• Easy to deploy and configure
• Built-in clustering and redundancy
• Supports bridging to other protocols
• Extensible through plugins

Cons

• Limited user management features
• No graphical user interface
• Steep learning curve for configuration
• Requires expertise with Erlang/OTP
• Not ideal for small scale deployments

Pricing Comparison

VerneMQ

• Open Source

emqtt

• Open Source
• Free
• Custom Pricing