Websyndic vs Backly

Struggling to choose between Websyndic and Backly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Websyndic is a News & Books solution with tags like rss, atom, aggregator, open-source.

It boasts features such as RSS/Atom feed reader, Customizable feed categories, Full-text search, Feed autodiscovery, OPML import/export, Mobile app support, Article archiving, Integration with external services and pros including Open source and self-hosted, Easy to install and use, Support for major platforms, Active development community, Customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, Backly is a Backup & Sync product tagged with backup, recovery, encryption, cloud-storage.

Its standout features include File backup, Folder backup, System image backup, Scheduling, Encryption, Retention policies, Recovery tools, and it shines with pros like Easy to use interface, Affordable pricing, Flexible backup destinations, Automated backups, Versioning.

Feature	Websyndic	Backly
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	News & Books	Backup & Sync

Product Overview

Websyndic

Description: Websyndic is an open-source web feed aggregator that allows users to subscribe to RSS and Atom feeds. It helps organize and read feeds in one place instead of visiting multiple websites.

Backly

Description: Backly is a backup and recovery software designed for small and medium-sized businesses. It provides an easy way to backup files, folders, and system images to local, network, or cloud storage. Key features include scheduling, encryption, retention policies, and recovery tools.

Key Features Comparison

Websyndic Features

• RSS/Atom feed reader
• Customizable feed categories
• Full-text search
• Feed autodiscovery
• OPML import/export
• Mobile app support
• Article archiving
• Integration with external services

Backly Features

• File backup
• Folder backup
• System image backup
• Scheduling
• Encryption
• Retention policies
• Recovery tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

Websyndic

Pros

• Open source and self-hosted
• Easy to install and use
• Support for major platforms
• Active development community
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Requires technical expertise to setup
• Limited native mobile apps
• Less features than commercial alternatives
• Can be resource intensive for large feeds

Backly

Pros

• Easy to use interface
• Affordable pricing
• Flexible backup destinations
• Automated backups
• Versioning

Cons

• Limited mobile app
• No physical server backup
• Lacks advanced reporting

Pricing Comparison

Websyndic

• Open Source
• Self-Hosted

Backly

• Subscription-Based