Wikimedia Commons vs Smithsonian Open Access

Struggling to choose between Wikimedia Commons and Smithsonian Open Access? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Wikimedia Commons is a Online Services solution with tags like images, videos, audio, media-repository, file-sharing, creative-commons.

It boasts features such as Large collection of freely-usable media files, Centralized location to store and share files, Support for images, videos, sounds, and other file types, Used in educational and creative projects and pros including Completely free to use, Massive selection of media, Active community of contributors, Flexible licensing options.

On the other hand, Smithsonian Open Access is a Education & Reference product tagged with open-access, smithsonian, research, digital-collections.

Its standout features include Provides free online access to millions of 2D and 3D digital items from the Smithsonian collections, Includes images, videos, audio files, 3D models, research data, and more across art, history, culture, and science, Allows users to browse, search and download high resolution images and media, Offers an API for developers to build applications using the content, and it shines with pros like Free access to high quality digitized content, Broad range of materials covering diverse topics and fields, High resolution downloads available, API enables innovative use of content.

Feature	Wikimedia Commons	Smithsonian Open Access
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Online Services	Education & Reference

Product Overview

Wikimedia Commons

Description: Wikimedia Commons is a media repository containing over 60 million freely usable media files. It provides a centralized location to store and share images, videos, sounds, and other files for use in educational and creative projects.

Smithsonian Open Access

Description: Smithsonian Open Access is an open access digital platform that provides free online access to millions of 2D and 3D digital items from the Smithsonian's collections. It includes images, videos, audio files, 3D models, research data, and more across art, history, culture, and science.

Key Features Comparison

Wikimedia Commons Features

• Large collection of freely-usable media files
• Centralized location to store and share files
• Support for images, videos, sounds, and other file types
• Used in educational and creative projects

Smithsonian Open Access Features

• Provides free online access to millions of 2D and 3D digital items from the Smithsonian collections
• Includes images, videos, audio files, 3D models, research data, and more across art, history, culture, and science
• Allows users to browse, search and download high resolution images and media
• Offers an API for developers to build applications using the content

Pros & Cons Analysis

Wikimedia Commons

Pros

• Completely free to use
• Massive selection of media
• Active community of contributors
• Flexible licensing options

Cons

• No quality control over uploads
• Difficult to find specific media
• Some files have unclear licensing terms
• Uploads require a Wikimedia account

Smithsonian Open Access

Pros

• Free access to high quality digitized content
• Broad range of materials covering diverse topics and fields
• High resolution downloads available
• API enables innovative use of content

Cons

• Limited contextual or background information on some items
• No option to order physical prints or merchandise
• Some parts of the collection not yet digitized
• Website interface could be improved

Pricing Comparison

Wikimedia Commons

• Open Source

Smithsonian Open Access

• Free