Wireshark vs tcpflow

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Wireshark icon
Wireshark
tcpflow icon
tcpflow

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Wireshark and tcpflow? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Wireshark is a Network & Admin solution with tags like network, troubleshooting, analysis, packet-capture, protocol-analyzer.

It boasts features such as Network protocol analyzer, Real-time capturing and offline analysis, Rich VoIP analysis, Read/write many different capture file formats, Live data can be read from Ethernet, IEEE 802.11, PPP/HDLC, ATM, Bluetooth, USB, Token Ring, Frame Relay, FDDI, and others, Decryption support for many protocols and pros including Powerful feature set, Cross-platform, Open source, Large user community support.

On the other hand, tcpflow is a Network & Admin product tagged with tcp, network, monitoring, flows, packets, capture.

Its standout features include Captures TCP traffic flows from live network interfaces or packet capture files, Reassembles TCP streams and stores application-layer data, Stores TCP metadata like sequence numbers, acknowledgments, window advertisements, Supports BPF filters for selective capturing, Outputs flows in various formats like ASCII, CSV, JSON, Can extract files based on signatures, Has a library API for programmatic access, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Lightweight and fast, Powerful BPF filtering capabilities, Extensible via plugins, Portable across platforms, Can extract files and media, CLI and library API available.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Wireshark and tcpflow?

When evaluating Wireshark versus tcpflow, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Wireshark and tcpflow have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include network, troubleshooting, analysis.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Wireshark and tcpflow significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include network, troubleshooting, analysis, packet-capture.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include network, troubleshooting and tcp, network.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Wireshark and tcpflow. You might also explore network, troubleshooting, analysis for alternative approaches.

Feature Wireshark tcpflow
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Wireshark
Wireshark

Description: Wireshark is an open-source packet analyzer software used for network troubleshooting, analysis, and communications protocol development. It allows users to see what's happening on their network at a microscopic level.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

tcpflow
tcpflow

Description: tcpflow is an open source tool for capturing TCP traffic flows. It works by capturing packets from network interfaces or packet capture files, reassembling TCP streams, and storing application-layer data with relevant TCP metadata.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Wireshark
Wireshark Features
  • Network protocol analyzer
  • Real-time capturing and offline analysis
  • Rich VoIP analysis
  • Read/write many different capture file formats
  • Live data can be read from Ethernet, IEEE 802.11, PPP/HDLC, ATM, Bluetooth, USB, Token Ring, Frame Relay, FDDI, and others
  • Decryption support for many protocols
tcpflow
tcpflow Features
  • Captures TCP traffic flows from live network interfaces or packet capture files
  • Reassembles TCP streams and stores application-layer data
  • Stores TCP metadata like sequence numbers, acknowledgments, window advertisements
  • Supports BPF filters for selective capturing
  • Outputs flows in various formats like ASCII, CSV, JSON
  • Can extract files based on signatures
  • Has a library API for programmatic access

Pros & Cons Analysis

Wireshark
Wireshark
Pros
  • Powerful feature set
  • Cross-platform
  • Open source
  • Large user community support
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Can be resource intensive
  • Capturing raw packets requires admin privileges
tcpflow
tcpflow
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Powerful BPF filtering capabilities
  • Extensible via plugins
  • Portable across platforms
  • Can extract files and media
  • CLI and library API available
Cons
  • Limited to TCP flows only
  • No fancy GUI
  • Steep learning curve
  • Need to process outputs for analysis
  • Not a full packet analyzer

Pricing Comparison

Wireshark
Wireshark
  • Open Source
tcpflow
tcpflow
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs