wolfSSL vs mbed TLS

Struggling to choose between wolfSSL and mbed TLS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

wolfSSL is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like ssl, tls, cryptography, encryption, security.

It boasts features such as Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation, Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc, Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile, Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management, Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache, Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols, Written in C for better performance and small footprint, Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency, Can be used with or without an OS layer and pros including Lightweight and fast performance, Small code footprint suitable for embedded use, Portable across many platforms and architectures, Open source and free to use, Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites, Easy to integrate and use in existing apps, Good for constrained environments like IoT, Customizable build options.

On the other hand, mbed TLS is a Security & Privacy product tagged with cryptography, tls, ssl, embedded-systems.

Its standout features include TLS/SSL protocol implementation, Cryptographic algorithms and ciphers, X.509 certificate handling, Authentication and encryption, Hardware acceleration support, Lightweight and modular codebase, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Compact code and small memory footprint, Highly configurable and customizable, Permissive Apache 2.0 license, Support for a wide range of platforms and architectures, Active development and maintenance.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

wolfSSL

wolfSSL

wolfSSL is an open source SSL/TLS library that is lightweight, portable, and provides encryption and authentication for applications. It supports common cipher suites and protocols, and has a small code footprint suitable for embedded systems.

Categories:
ssl tls cryptography encryption security

WolfSSL Features

  1. Lightweight SSL/TLS implementation
  2. Supports common cipher suites like AES, RSA, ECC, SHA2, etc
  3. Works across platforms like embedded systems, desktops, mobile
  4. Provides encryption, authentication, and certificate management
  5. Integration with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache
  6. Support for TLS 1.3 and other latest protocols
  7. Written in C for better performance and small footprint
  8. Support for session resumption and caching for efficiency
  9. Can be used with or without an OS layer

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Lightweight and fast performance

Small code footprint suitable for embedded use

Portable across many platforms and architectures

Open source and free to use

Supports latest TLS versions and cipher suites

Easy to integrate and use in existing apps

Good for constrained environments like IoT

Customizable build options

Cons

Lacks some advanced TLS features compared to OpenSSL

Limited support for older platforms and compilers

Smaller community than more popular SSL libraries

Not as extensively battle-tested as older options

Lacks bindings for some languages


mbed TLS

mbed TLS

mbed TLS is an open source cryptographic library that provides TLS and SSL capabilities for embedded devices. It is designed to be compact, fast, and flexible enough for both small and large embedded systems.

Categories:
cryptography tls ssl embedded-systems

Mbed TLS Features

  1. TLS/SSL protocol implementation
  2. Cryptographic algorithms and ciphers
  3. X.509 certificate handling
  4. Authentication and encryption
  5. Hardware acceleration support
  6. Lightweight and modular codebase

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Compact code and small memory footprint

Highly configurable and customizable

Permissive Apache 2.0 license

Support for a wide range of platforms and architectures

Active development and maintenance

Cons

Limited native HTTPS server implementation

Lacks some advanced TLS features

Not as widely used as OpenSSL

Requires cryptographic expertise to configure securely

Limited hardware acceleration support