Struggling to choose between wpull and SiteSucker? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
wpull is a Network & Admin solution with tags like downloader, crawler, website, automation.
It boasts features such as Recursively downloads entire websites, Supports HTTP, HTTPS and FTP protocols, Resumes broken downloads, Saves files in WARC format, Customizable via Python scripts, Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows and macOS and pros including Free and open source, Powerful crawling and scraping capabilities, Good for archiving websites, Extendable and customizable, Actively maintained.
On the other hand, SiteSucker is a Web Browsers product tagged with website, downloader, offline, browsing.
Its standout features include Downloads entire websites for offline browsing, Automatically scans and downloads web pages, images, CSS, JavaScript, etc., Supports FTP and SFTP sites in addition to HTTP/HTTPS, Resumes broken downloads, Filters downloads by file type, size, date, etc, Scheduled and automated downloading, and it shines with pros like Fast and easy full website downloads, Preserves original website structure and assets, Great for archiving sites or researching them offline, Wide protocol support beyond just HTTP, Powerful filtering and automation capabilities.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
wpull is an open-source website downloader and crawler for Linux, Windows, and macOS. It can recursively download entire websites and handle various web formats. wpull is scriptable and customizable to automate large downloads.
SiteSucker is a Mac application that allows users to download entire websites for offline browsing. It automatically scans sites and downloads web pages, images, CSS, JavaScript, and other files.