wpull vs SiteSucker

Struggling to choose between wpull and SiteSucker? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

wpull is a Network & Admin solution with tags like downloader, crawler, website, automation.

It boasts features such as Recursively downloads entire websites, Supports HTTP, HTTPS and FTP protocols, Resumes broken downloads, Saves files in WARC format, Customizable via Python scripts, Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows and macOS and pros including Free and open source, Powerful crawling and scraping capabilities, Good for archiving websites, Extendable and customizable, Actively maintained.

On the other hand, SiteSucker is a Web Browsers product tagged with website, downloader, offline, browsing.

Its standout features include Downloads entire websites for offline browsing, Automatically scans and downloads web pages, images, CSS, JavaScript, etc., Supports FTP and SFTP sites in addition to HTTP/HTTPS, Resumes broken downloads, Filters downloads by file type, size, date, etc, Scheduled and automated downloading, and it shines with pros like Fast and easy full website downloads, Preserves original website structure and assets, Great for archiving sites or researching them offline, Wide protocol support beyond just HTTP, Powerful filtering and automation capabilities.

Feature	wpull	SiteSucker
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Web Browsers

Product Overview

wpull

Description: wpull is an open-source website downloader and crawler for Linux, Windows, and macOS. It can recursively download entire websites and handle various web formats. wpull is scriptable and customizable to automate large downloads.

SiteSucker

Description: SiteSucker is a Mac application that allows users to download entire websites for offline browsing. It automatically scans sites and downloads web pages, images, CSS, JavaScript, and other files.

Key Features Comparison

wpull Features

• Recursively downloads entire websites
• Supports HTTP, HTTPS and FTP protocols
• Resumes broken downloads
• Saves files in WARC format
• Customizable via Python scripts
• Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows and macOS

SiteSucker Features

• Downloads entire websites for offline browsing
• Automatically scans and downloads web pages, images, CSS, JavaScript, etc.
• Supports FTP and SFTP sites in addition to HTTP/HTTPS
• Resumes broken downloads
• Filters downloads by file type, size, date, etc
• Scheduled and automated downloading

Pros & Cons Analysis

wpull

Pros

• Free and open source
• Powerful crawling and scraping capabilities
• Good for archiving websites
• Extendable and customizable
• Actively maintained

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Requires coding skills for advanced usage
• No GUI
• Less user friendly than browser extensions
• Lacks some features of commercial download managers

SiteSucker

Pros

• Fast and easy full website downloads
• Preserves original website structure and assets
• Great for archiving sites or researching them offline
• Wide protocol support beyond just HTTP
• Powerful filtering and automation capabilities

Cons

• Mac only
• No Windows or Linux version
• Can generate heavy bandwidth usage
• No browser integration
• Limited scheduling options

Pricing Comparison

wpull

• Open Source

SiteSucker

• One-time Purchase