wxWidgets vs Qt

Struggling to choose between wxWidgets and Qt? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

wxWidgets is a Development solution with tags like crossplatform, c, widget-toolkit, gui.

It boasts features such as Cross-platform GUI library for C++, Supports Windows, macOS, Linux, Unix and other platforms, Wide range of widgets including buttons, menus, toolbars, text controls, etc, Device context classes for drawing and graphics, Internationalization and localization support, XML-based user interface layout, Bindings for other languages like Python, Perl, Ruby, etc and pros including Native look and feel on each platform, Large user base and active development community, Permissive open source license (LGPL), Extensive documentation and samples, Highly customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, Qt is a Development product tagged with crossplatform, gui, cli, desktop-apps, mobile-apps, embedded-systems.

Its standout features include Cross-platform development, Comprehensive widget set and UI building tools, Integrated IDE (Qt Creator), Signals and slots for inter-object communication, Model/view architecture, Graphics framework and 2D rendering engine, XML parser, Networking and connectivity libraries, Multimedia and audio support, Database access through SQL drivers, Web browser engine (Qt WebEngine), and it shines with pros like Write once, deploy anywhere, Large ecosystem of libraries and add-ons, High performance and small executable sizes, Integrated GUI designer and debugger, Clean and consistent API design, Good documentation and community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

wxWidgets is an open source widget toolkit that allows developers to create cross-platform user interfaces for desktop, mobile and embedded applications using C++. It offers native look and feel on Windows, Mac, Linux and other platforms.

Categories:
crossplatform c widget-toolkit gui

WxWidgets Features

  1. Cross-platform GUI library for C++
  2. Supports Windows, macOS, Linux, Unix and other platforms
  3. Wide range of widgets including buttons, menus, toolbars, text controls, etc
  4. Device context classes for drawing and graphics
  5. Internationalization and localization support
  6. XML-based user interface layout
  7. Bindings for other languages like Python, Perl, Ruby, etc

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Native look and feel on each platform

Large user base and active development community

Permissive open source license (LGPL)

Extensive documentation and samples

Highly customizable and extensible

Cons

Steep learning curve compared to other GUI toolkits

Not as visually polished as some commercial options

Limited native support for 3D graphics

No built-in database connectivity


Qt

Qt

Qt is a cross-platform application development framework focused on creating GUI and CLI apps for desktop, mobile and embedded platforms. It includes a class library and tools designed to streamline the process of writing and maintaining applications across platforms.

Categories:
crossplatform gui cli desktop-apps mobile-apps embedded-systems

Qt Features

  1. Cross-platform development
  2. Comprehensive widget set and UI building tools
  3. Integrated IDE (Qt Creator)
  4. Signals and slots for inter-object communication
  5. Model/view architecture
  6. Graphics framework and 2D rendering engine
  7. XML parser
  8. Networking and connectivity libraries
  9. Multimedia and audio support
  10. Database access through SQL drivers
  11. Web browser engine (Qt WebEngine)

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Commercial License

Pros

Write once, deploy anywhere

Large ecosystem of libraries and add-ons

High performance and small executable sizes

Integrated GUI designer and debugger

Clean and consistent API design

Good documentation and community support

Cons

Steep learning curve

Binary compatibility issues when upgrading

Limited native look and feel on some platforms

Not as lightweight as some alternatives

Lacks some features of native platforms