xchm vs ChmFox

Struggling to choose between xchm and ChmFox? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

xchm is a Office & Productivity solution with tags like chm, viewer, microsoft, compiled-html.

It boasts features such as Table of contents pane, Text searching, Indexing, Ability to print pages and pros including Open source, Easy to use, Good CHM file support, Available on Linux.

On the other hand, ChmFox is a Education & Reference product tagged with chm, viewer, docs, reader, help-files.

Its standout features include View CHM files, Search contents, Navigate table of contents, Add bookmarks, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Simple and easy to use, Good CHM file compatibility.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

xchm

xchm

xchm is an open-source CHM file viewer for Linux. It allows users to easily view Microsoft Compiled HTML (.chm) documents. Some key features include a table of contents pane, text searching, indexing, and the ability to print pages.

Categories:
chm viewer microsoft compiled-html

Xchm Features

  1. Table of contents pane
  2. Text searching
  3. Indexing
  4. Ability to print pages

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source

Easy to use

Good CHM file support

Available on Linux

Cons

Limited features compared to proprietary options

Few customization options

No support for other file types


ChmFox

ChmFox

ChmFox is a free, open source CHM file viewer for Windows. It provides a simple interface for reading .CHM documentation files, with features like search, bookmarks, and table of contents navigation.

Categories:
chm viewer docs reader help-files

ChmFox Features

  1. View CHM files
  2. Search contents
  3. Navigate table of contents
  4. Add bookmarks

Pricing

  • Free
  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Simple and easy to use

Good CHM file compatibility

Cons

Limited features compared to paid alternatives

Development seems inactive

Windows only