Xmonad vs Hyprland
Struggling to choose between Xmonad and Hyprland? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
Xmonad is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like tiling, haskell, unix, linux, window-manager.
It boasts features such as Tiling window manager, Configurable in Haskell, Dynamic window management, Keyboard-driven workflow, Extensible through plugins and pros including Highly customizable, Very efficient use of screen space, Keyboard shortcuts for everything, Lightweight and fast.
On the other hand, Hyprland is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, minimal, fast, customizable, wayland.
Its standout features include Dynamic tiling, Customizable, Minimal resource usage, Supports tiling, floating and fullscreen layouts, Multiple monitor support, and it shines with pros like Very fast and lightweight, Highly customizable, Efficient use of screen space with tiling, Supports Wayland natively.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
Xmonad
Xmonad is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is written in Haskell and dynamically manages windows to maximize screen space and productivity.
Categories:
Xmonad Features
- Tiling window manager
- Configurable in Haskell
- Dynamic window management
- Keyboard-driven workflow
- Extensible through plugins
Pricing
- Open Source
Pros
Cons
Hyprland
Hyprland is a dynamic tiling Wayland compositor known for its speed, customizability and minimal resource usage. It supports tiling, floating and fullscreen layouts, as well as multiple monitors.
Categories:
Hyprland Features
- Dynamic tiling
- Customizable
- Minimal resource usage
- Supports tiling, floating and fullscreen layouts
- Multiple monitor support
Pricing
- Open Source