Xmonad vs i3-gaps
Struggling to choose between Xmonad and i3-gaps? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
Xmonad is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like tiling, haskell, unix, linux, window-manager.
It boasts features such as Tiling window manager, Configurable in Haskell, Dynamic window management, Keyboard-driven workflow, Extensible through plugins and pros including Highly customizable, Very efficient use of screen space, Keyboard shortcuts for everything, Lightweight and fast.
On the other hand, i3-gaps is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, customizable, gaps-between-windows.
Its standout features include Tiling window manager, Keyboard driven, Customizable via config file, Gaps between windows, Split-screen functionality, Workspace support, Status bar, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Efficient use of screen space, Very customizable, Keyboard shortcuts for everything, Low resource usage.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
Xmonad
Xmonad is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is written in Haskell and dynamically manages windows to maximize screen space and productivity.
Categories:
Xmonad Features
- Tiling window manager
- Configurable in Haskell
- Dynamic window management
- Keyboard-driven workflow
- Extensible through plugins
Pricing
- Open Source
Pros
Cons
i3-gaps
i3-gaps is a fork of the i3 tiling window manager that adds additional functionality like gaps between windows. It's lightweight, customizable, and keyboard-driven.
Categories:
I3-gaps Features
- Tiling window manager
- Keyboard driven
- Customizable via config file
- Gaps between windows
- Split-screen functionality
- Workspace support
- Status bar
Pricing
- Open Source