Zdog vs Whitestorm.js

Struggling to choose between Zdog and Whitestorm.js? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Zdog is a Photos & Graphics solution with tags like 3d, modeling, animation, svg, webgl.

It boasts features such as Uses flat 2D shapes to create 3D models, Renders shapes with SVG and WebGL for high performance, Creates simple, rounded edge models like paper cutouts or wood blocks, Can create 3D animations, Open source JavaScript library and pros including Lightweight and fast, Easy to learn and use, Good for simple, low-poly 3D graphics, Works well across browsers, Active community support.

On the other hand, Whitestorm.js is a Development product tagged with 3d, webgl, game-development.

Its standout features include Modular architecture, Built-in physics engine, Asset loading, Animations, Post-processing effects, and it shines with pros like Active development and support, Good documentation, Large community, High-level abstractions, Cross-platform.

Feature	Zdog	Whitestorm.js
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Photos & Graphics	Development

Product Overview

Zdog

Description: Zdog is a JavaScript library for creating 3D models and animations using flat 2D shapes. It renders shapes using SVG and WebGL for high performance. Zdog models have simple, rounded edges like paper cutouts or wood blocks.

Whitestorm.js

Description: Whitestorm.js is an open-source JavaScript framework for building 3D web applications and games using WebGL. It provides high-level abstractions and useful tools like physics engines, animators, and asset loaders to accelerate development.

Key Features Comparison

Zdog Features

• Uses flat 2D shapes to create 3D models
• Renders shapes with SVG and WebGL for high performance
• Creates simple, rounded edge models like paper cutouts or wood blocks
• Can create 3D animations
• Open source JavaScript library

Whitestorm.js Features

• Modular architecture
• Built-in physics engine
• Asset loading
• Animations
• Post-processing effects

Pros & Cons Analysis

Zdog

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Easy to learn and use
• Good for simple, low-poly 3D graphics
• Works well across browsers
• Active community support

Cons

• Not suitable for complex 3D models
• Limited built-in shapes and textures
• Less control compared to full 3D engines
• Requires coding skills to use

Whitestorm.js

Pros

• Active development and support
• Good documentation
• Large community
• High-level abstractions
• Cross-platform

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Not as feature-rich as some paid options
• Limited browser support without polyfills

Pricing Comparison

Zdog

• Open Source

Whitestorm.js

• Open Source