zrok vs inlets

Struggling to choose between zrok and inlets? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

zrok is a Remote Work & Education solution with tags like opensource, selfhosted, video-calls, screen-sharing, messaging, encrypted.

It boasts features such as Encrypted video calls, Screen sharing, Messaging between users, Virtual backgrounds, Polling, Recording calls, Breakout rooms and pros including Open source, Self-hosted, End-to-end encryption, Customizable, No vendor lock-in.

On the other hand, inlets is a Network & Admin product tagged with networking, tunneling, vpn, cloud, security.

Its standout features include Expose internal services on public URLs or domains, Tunnel traffic through a single endpoint server, Use WebSockets for secure communication, No need to open firewall ports, Written in Go programming language, Open source and cloud-native, and it shines with pros like Secure way to expose internal services, Easy to set up and configure, Scalable and highly available, Supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments, Lightweight and efficient.

Feature	zrok	inlets
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Remote Work & Education	Network & Admin

Product Overview

zrok

Description: Zrok is an open-source, self-hosted alternative to Zoom and other video conferencing software. It allows for encrypted video calls, screen sharing, and messaging between users.

inlets

Description: Inlets is an open source cloud native tunnel written in Go that can expose internal services on public URLs or domains by tunneling traffic through a single endpoint server. It uses websockets and works well for exposing services securely without opening firewall ports.

Key Features Comparison

zrok Features

• Encrypted video calls
• Screen sharing
• Messaging between users
• Virtual backgrounds
• Polling
• Recording calls
• Breakout rooms

inlets Features

• Expose internal services on public URLs or domains
• Tunnel traffic through a single endpoint server
• Use WebSockets for secure communication
• No need to open firewall ports
• Written in Go programming language
• Open source and cloud-native

Pros & Cons Analysis

zrok

Pros

• Open source
• Self-hosted
• End-to-end encryption
• Customizable
• No vendor lock-in

Cons

• Requires self-hosting
• Limited integrations compared to Zoom
• Smaller user base
• Less polished UI

inlets

Pros

• Secure way to expose internal services
• Easy to set up and configure
• Scalable and highly available
• Supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments
• Lightweight and efficient

Cons

• Requires an external server for the tunnel endpoint
• May introduce additional latency or network overhead
• Limited to WebSocket-based communication

Pricing Comparison

zrok

• Open Source
• Self-Hosted

inlets

• Open Source