zrok vs localhost.run

Struggling to choose between zrok and localhost.run? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

zrok is a Remote Work & Education solution with tags like opensource, selfhosted, video-calls, screen-sharing, messaging, encrypted.

It boasts features such as Encrypted video calls, Screen sharing, Messaging between users, Virtual backgrounds, Polling, Recording calls, Breakout rooms and pros including Open source, Self-hosted, End-to-end encryption, Customizable, No vendor lock-in.

On the other hand, localhost.run is a Development product tagged with localhost, development-environment, sandbox.

Its standout features include Browser-based development environments, Preconfigured sandboxes for various languages and frameworks, Collaboration features like shareable URLs and multiplayer mode, Integrated terminal and file explorer, Snapshots to save state of environments, GitHub/GitLab integration, and it shines with pros like No need to install languages/tools locally, Disposable environments, Fast setup, Accessible from any device, Collaboration capabilities, GitHub integration.

Feature	zrok	localhost.run
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Remote Work & Education	Development

Product Overview

zrok

Description: Zrok is an open-source, self-hosted alternative to Zoom and other video conferencing software. It allows for encrypted video calls, screen sharing, and messaging between users.

localhost.run

Description: localhost.run is a platform that allows you to easily spin up local development environments inside your browser. It eliminates the need to install software locally by providing disposable, ready-to-code sandboxes for various languages and frameworks.

Key Features Comparison

zrok Features

• Encrypted video calls
• Screen sharing
• Messaging between users
• Virtual backgrounds
• Polling
• Recording calls
• Breakout rooms

localhost.run Features

• Browser-based development environments
• Preconfigured sandboxes for various languages and frameworks
• Collaboration features like shareable URLs and multiplayer mode
• Integrated terminal and file explorer
• Snapshots to save state of environments
• GitHub/GitLab integration

Pros & Cons Analysis

zrok

Pros

• Open source
• Self-hosted
• End-to-end encryption
• Customizable
• No vendor lock-in

Cons

• Requires self-hosting
• Limited integrations compared to Zoom
• Smaller user base
• Less polished UI

localhost.run

Pros

• No need to install languages/tools locally
• Disposable environments
• Fast setup
• Accessible from any device
• Collaboration capabilities
• GitHub integration

Cons

• Limited to web-based languages/frameworks
• Performance dependent on browser/internet speed
• Features may be limited compared to local setup
• Requires internet connection

Pricing Comparison

zrok

• Open Source
• Self-Hosted

localhost.run

• Freemium