Skip to content

ActivityWatch vs Earthly

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs.

ActivityWatch icon
ActivityWatch
Earthly icon
Earthly

ActivityWatch vs Earthly: The Verdict

Last updated: May 2026 · Comparison by Sugggest Editorial Team

Feature ActivityWatch Earthly
Sugggest Score
Category Productivity Development
Pricing Open Source Open Source

Product Overview

ActivityWatch
ActivityWatch

Description: ActivityWatch is an open-source automated time tracker that monitors what you do on your computer. It helps analyze and visualize how you spend your time so you can become more productive.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

Key Features Comparison

ActivityWatch
ActivityWatch Features
  • Tracks time spent in applications and websites
  • Provides timeline visualization of computer usage
  • Open source and cross-platform (Windows, Mac, Linux)
  • Stores data locally by default to protect privacy
  • Web extension and desktop app available
  • Customizable using Python scripts and REST API
  • Can ignore/exclude apps and websites
Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

ActivityWatch
ActivityWatch
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Simple graphical timeline
  • Lightweight resource usage
  • Protects privacy by default
  • Cross-platform support
Cons
  • Limited analytics and data visualization
  • Requires technical knowledge to customize
  • No mobile app
  • Not as full-featured as commercial competitors
Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

ActivityWatch
ActivityWatch
  • Open Source
Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs