CircleCI vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between CircleCI and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CircleCI is a Development solution with tags like cicd, testing, deployment, automation, analytics, monitoring.

It boasts features such as Cloud-based CI/CD platform, Supports multiple languages and frameworks, Parallel test splitting, Configurable workflows, Artifact storage, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc. and pros including Easy setup and configuration, Fast build times, Scalable infrastructure, Detailed build logs and insights, Flexible pricing options.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	CircleCI	Earthly
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

CircleCI

Description: CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that helps developers automate building, testing, and deploying applications. It offers cloud-based infrastructure for running jobs in Linux containers along with insights through analytics and monitoring.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

CircleCI Features

• Cloud-based CI/CD platform
• Supports multiple languages and frameworks
• Parallel test splitting
• Configurable workflows
• Artifact storage
• Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc.

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

CircleCI

Pros

• Easy setup and configuration
• Fast build times
• Scalable infrastructure
• Detailed build logs and insights
• Flexible pricing options

Cons

• Can have a steep learning curve
• No native support for Windows containers
• Additional costs for more parallelism
• Limited free plan

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

CircleCI

• Free
• Subscription-Based

Earthly

• Open Source