CircleCI vs Earthly

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

CircleCI icon
CircleCI
Earthly icon
Earthly

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between CircleCI and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CircleCI is a Development solution with tags like cicd, testing, deployment, automation, analytics, monitoring.

It boasts features such as Cloud-based CI/CD platform, Supports multiple languages and frameworks, Parallel test splitting, Configurable workflows, Artifact storage, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc. and pros including Easy setup and configuration, Fast build times, Scalable infrastructure, Detailed build logs and insights, Flexible pricing options.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare CircleCI and Earthly?

When evaluating CircleCI versus Earthly, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

CircleCI and Earthly have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include cicd, testing, deployment.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between CircleCI and Earthly significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include cicd, testing, deployment, automation.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include cicd, testing and build, automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between CircleCI and Earthly. You might also explore cicd, testing, deployment for alternative approaches.

Feature CircleCI Earthly
Overall Score 1 N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

CircleCI
CircleCI

Description: CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that helps developers automate building, testing, and deploying applications. It offers cloud-based infrastructure for running jobs in Linux containers along with insights through analytics and monitoring.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

CircleCI
CircleCI Features
  • Cloud-based CI/CD platform
  • Supports multiple languages and frameworks
  • Parallel test splitting
  • Configurable workflows
  • Artifact storage
  • Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc.
Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

CircleCI
CircleCI
Pros
  • Easy setup and configuration
  • Fast build times
  • Scalable infrastructure
  • Detailed build logs and insights
  • Flexible pricing options
Cons
  • Can have a steep learning curve
  • No native support for Windows containers
  • Additional costs for more parallelism
  • Limited free plan
Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

CircleCI
CircleCI
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based
Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs