Buildbot vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between Buildbot and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Buildbot is a Development solution with tags like automation, testing, build, cicd.

It boasts features such as Continuous integration and deployment, Configurable build steps, Plugin architecture, Web UI, REST API, Real-time build status, Source code management integration, Build scheduling, Notifications, Distributed building, Dashboard, Access control, Logging, Statistics, Customizable UI, Self-hosted, Multi-platform, Auto-scaling and pros including Open source and free, Highly customizable, Large plugin ecosystem, Active development community, Comprehensive feature set, Self-hosted option, Supports many version control systems, Real-time build monitoring, Distributed building capability, Web UI and REST API, Access control for security.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	Buildbot	Earthly
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Buildbot

Description: Buildbot is an open-source continuous integration framework for automating software build, test, and release processes. It allows developers to detect problems early, monitor progress, and improve productivity.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

Buildbot Features

• Continuous integration and deployment
• Configurable build steps
• Plugin architecture
• Web UI
• REST API
• Real-time build status
• Source code management integration
• Build scheduling
• Notifications
• Distributed building
• Dashboard
• Access control
• Logging
• Statistics
• Customizable UI
• Self-hosted
• Multi-platform
• Auto-scaling

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Buildbot

Pros

• Open source and free
• Highly customizable
• Large plugin ecosystem
• Active development community
• Comprehensive feature set
• Self-hosted option
• Supports many version control systems
• Real-time build monitoring
• Distributed building capability
• Web UI and REST API
• Access control for security

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex configuration
• Limited prebuilt integrations
• Requires self-hosting and maintenance
• Not as user friendly as some alternatives

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

Buildbot

• Open Source

Earthly

• Open Source