Concourse vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between Concourse and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Concourse is a Development solution with tags like automation, pipelines, build, test, deploy.

It boasts features such as Workflow automation, Resource management, Job scheduling, Integration with source control, CLI and web UI, Access controls and security and pros including Open source and free, Easy to set up and use, Scalable, Integrates with many tools and technologies, Active community support.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	Concourse	Earthly
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Concourse

Description: Concourse is an open-source continuous thing platform for automation of pipelines in software development. It provides resources and tasks that can be combined into pipelines to automate build, test, and deployment processes.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

Concourse Features

• Workflow automation
• Resource management
• Job scheduling
• Integration with source control
• CLI and web UI
• Access controls and security

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Concourse

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to set up and use
• Scalable
• Integrates with many tools and technologies
• Active community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited documentation
• Not as feature rich as some paid options

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

Concourse

• Open Source
• Free

Earthly

• Open Source