Agola vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between Agola and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Agola is a Development solution with tags like automation, build, test, deploy, release, pipeline, caching, artifact-management, configuration-as-code.

It boasts features such as Configuration as code, Built-in caching, Artifact management, Integrations with various tools, Automated build pipelines, Automated testing, Automated deployments, Automated releases and pros including Open source and free, Easy to configure pipelines as code, Good performance with built-in caching, Integrates well with many tools, Automates and simplifies software workflows.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	Agola	Earthly
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Agola

Description: Agola is an open-source platform for automating software development workflows. It allows you to define pipelines to build, test, deploy, and release your software projects. Key features include configuration as code, built-in caching, artifact management, and integrations with various tools.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

Agola Features

• Configuration as code
• Built-in caching
• Artifact management
• Integrations with various tools
• Automated build pipelines
• Automated testing
• Automated deployments
• Automated releases

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Agola

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to configure pipelines as code
• Good performance with built-in caching
• Integrates well with many tools
• Automates and simplifies software workflows

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Steep learning curve
• Not as feature rich as some commercial options

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

Agola

• Open Source

Earthly

• Open Source