Ansible vs Puppet

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Ansible icon
Ansible
Puppet icon
Puppet

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Ansible and Puppet? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Ansible is a Network & Admin solution with tags like automation, configuration-management, deployment.

It boasts features such as Agentless architecture, Uses YAML playbooks to define automation tasks, Idempotent execution of tasks, Large library of modules for interacting with different systems, Push-based model for deploying configuration changes, Supports parallel execution of tasks and pros including Very simple to set up and use, Powerful automation capabilities, Agentless model reduces resource usage, Playbooks provide infrastructure as code, Active open source community.

On the other hand, Puppet is a Network & Admin product tagged with configuration-management, automation, infrastructure-automation.

Its standout features include Configuration Management, Infrastructure Automation, Continuous Delivery, and it shines with pros like Powerful DSL for infrastructure automation, Large ecosystem of modules and plugins, Agentless architecture, Cross-platform support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Ansible and Puppet?

When evaluating Ansible versus Puppet, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Ansible and Puppet have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include automation, configuration-management, deployment.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Ansible and Puppet significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include automation, configuration-management, deployment.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include automation, configuration-management and configuration-management, automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Ansible and Puppet. You might also explore automation, configuration-management, deployment for alternative approaches.

Feature Ansible Puppet
Overall Score 1 1
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Ansible
Ansible

Description: Ansible, an open-source automation tool for configuration management, application deployment, and task orchestration. Using a simple, human-readable language, Ansible enables efficient automation of IT infrastructure. It streamlines complex tasks, promotes consistency, and empowers teams to manage infrastructure as code.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Puppet
Puppet

Description: Puppet is an open source configuration management and automation tool. It helps system administrators manage IT infrastructure by automating repetitive tasks, enforcing desired state configuration, and increasing efficiency.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Ansible
Ansible Features
  • Agentless architecture
  • Uses YAML playbooks to define automation tasks
  • Idempotent execution of tasks
  • Large library of modules for interacting with different systems
  • Push-based model for deploying configuration changes
  • Supports parallel execution of tasks
Puppet
Puppet Features
  • Configuration Management
  • Infrastructure Automation
  • Continuous Delivery

Pros & Cons Analysis

Ansible
Ansible
Pros
  • Very simple to set up and use
  • Powerful automation capabilities
  • Agentless model reduces resource usage
  • Playbooks provide infrastructure as code
  • Active open source community
Cons
  • Limited Windows support compared to Linux
  • Steeper learning curve than some other tools
  • Not ideal for large, complex environments without additional orchestration
  • Upgrades can sometimes break playbooks
Puppet
Puppet
Pros
  • Powerful DSL for infrastructure automation
  • Large ecosystem of modules and plugins
  • Agentless architecture
  • Cross-platform support
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Can be complex to set up and manage
  • Limited UI and reporting capabilities
  • Not ideal for small environments

Pricing Comparison

Ansible
Ansible
  • Open Source
Puppet
Puppet
  • Open Source
  • Commercial License

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs