Applocker vs Carbon Black Protection

Struggling to choose between Applocker and Carbon Black Protection? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Applocker is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like access-control, app-locker, whitelisting.

It boasts features such as Allows administrators to control which apps and files users can run or access on a computer, Sets rules and policies to only allow trusted apps, Helps prevent malicious software, Supports both allow and block rules, Provides centralized management of app control policies, Supports various app types including Windows apps, scripts, and installers and pros including Enhances security by restricting access to untrusted apps, Provides granular control over app execution, Simplifies app management and enforcement, Integrates with Active Directory for policy deployment, Offers logging and reporting capabilities.

On the other hand, Carbon Black Protection is a Security & Privacy product tagged with antivirus, endpoint-detection, response, managed-detection, managed-response, threat-hunting, artificial-intelligence.

Its standout features include Preventative controls to block malicious files, Real-time detection and response to threats, Centralized visibility and control, Behavioral analysis and machine learning, Integration with other security products, and it shines with pros like Effective at preventing malware infections, Fast threat detection and automated response, Easy to deploy and manage, Works across platforms and devices, Good for compliance reporting.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Applocker

Applocker

Applocker is a Windows feature that allows administrators to control which apps and files users can run or access on a computer. It sets rules and policies to only allow trusted apps, helping prevent malicious software.

Categories:
access-control app-locker whitelisting

Applocker Features

  1. Allows administrators to control which apps and files users can run or access on a computer
  2. Sets rules and policies to only allow trusted apps
  3. Helps prevent malicious software
  4. Supports both allow and block rules
  5. Provides centralized management of app control policies
  6. Supports various app types including Windows apps, scripts, and installers

Pricing

  • Free (as part of Windows Enterprise/Education editions)

Pros

Enhances security by restricting access to untrusted apps

Provides granular control over app execution

Simplifies app management and enforcement

Integrates with Active Directory for policy deployment

Offers logging and reporting capabilities

Cons

Complexity in setting up and maintaining policies

Potential compatibility issues with certain applications

Limited support for non-Windows platforms

Requires careful planning and testing to avoid disrupting user productivity


Carbon Black Protection

Carbon Black Protection

Carbon Black Protection is an endpoint protection platform that uses predictive artificial intelligence to stop cyberattacks. It combines antivirus, endpoint detection and response, managed detection and response, and managed threat hunting.

Categories:
antivirus endpoint-detection response managed-detection managed-response threat-hunting artificial-intelligence

Carbon Black Protection Features

  1. Preventative controls to block malicious files
  2. Real-time detection and response to threats
  3. Centralized visibility and control
  4. Behavioral analysis and machine learning
  5. Integration with other security products

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Effective at preventing malware infections

Fast threat detection and automated response

Easy to deploy and manage

Works across platforms and devices

Good for compliance reporting

Cons

Can generate false positives

Requires tuning for optimal results

Resource intensive endpoint agents

Expensive licensing model

Limited support for Linux endpoints