Arkime vs CloudShark

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Arkime icon
Arkime
CloudShark icon
CloudShark

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Arkime and CloudShark? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Arkime is a Network & Admin solution with tags like network, traffic, analyzer, forensics.

It boasts features such as Real-time packet capture, Web-based interface, Customizable dashboards, Alerting and reporting, Supports various data inputs, Scalable and distributed architecture, Plugin support for extensibility and pros including Open source and free, High performance packet capture, Intuitive web UI, Powerful analysis and visualization, Flexible and extensible, Scales to monitor large networks.

On the other hand, CloudShark is a Network & Admin product tagged with networking, packets, analysis, pcap, troubleshooting.

Its standout features include Web-based interface for analyzing packet captures, Support for PCAP and PCAPNG file formats, Filtering and searching of packets, Extraction of files, images etc. from packet data, Statistical analysis e.g. top talkers, protocol breakdown, Annotation and commenting on packets, Sharing of packet captures, and it shines with pros like Easy to use without installing any software, Collaboration features allow teams to analyze captures together, Scales to handle large capture files, Integrates with other cloud services like Dropbox, Can access captures from anywhere with an internet connection.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Arkime and CloudShark?

When evaluating Arkime versus CloudShark, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Arkime and CloudShark have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include network, traffic, analyzer.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Arkime and CloudShark significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include network, traffic, analyzer, forensics.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include network, traffic and networking, packets.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Arkime and CloudShark. You might also explore network, traffic, analyzer for alternative approaches.

Feature Arkime CloudShark
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Arkime
Arkime

Description: Arkime is an open-source network traffic analyzer that captures packets in real-time and enables users to search, analyze and visualize network traffic. It can handle high bandwidth with the ability to capture at rates up to 40 Gbps. Arkime provides a powerful interface for forensic analysis.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

CloudShark
CloudShark

Description: CloudShark is a cloud-based network packet analyzer that allows users to upload packet capture files and analyze them using a web browser. It provides features like filtering, extraction, statistics, search, and sharing of PCAPs.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Arkime
Arkime Features
  • Real-time packet capture
  • Web-based interface
  • Customizable dashboards
  • Alerting and reporting
  • Supports various data inputs
  • Scalable and distributed architecture
  • Plugin support for extensibility
CloudShark
CloudShark Features
  • Web-based interface for analyzing packet captures
  • Support for PCAP and PCAPNG file formats
  • Filtering and searching of packets
  • Extraction of files, images etc. from packet data
  • Statistical analysis e.g. top talkers, protocol breakdown
  • Annotation and commenting on packets
  • Sharing of packet captures

Pros & Cons Analysis

Arkime
Arkime
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • High performance packet capture
  • Intuitive web UI
  • Powerful analysis and visualization
  • Flexible and extensible
  • Scales to monitor large networks
Cons
  • Complex initial setup
  • Steep learning curve
  • Requires dedicated hardware
  • Limited support options
CloudShark
CloudShark
Pros
  • Easy to use without installing any software
  • Collaboration features allow teams to analyze captures together
  • Scales to handle large capture files
  • Integrates with other cloud services like Dropbox
  • Can access captures from anywhere with an internet connection
Cons
  • Upload speeds can limit analyzing large captures
  • Sensitive data is stored on external servers
  • Advanced features may require paid plans
  • Lacks some features of desktop packet analysis tools

Pricing Comparison

Arkime
Arkime
  • Open Source
CloudShark
CloudShark
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs