Arkime vs CloudShark

Struggling to choose between Arkime and CloudShark? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Arkime is a Network & Admin solution with tags like network, traffic, analyzer, forensics.

It boasts features such as Real-time packet capture, Web-based interface, Customizable dashboards, Alerting and reporting, Supports various data inputs, Scalable and distributed architecture, Plugin support for extensibility and pros including Open source and free, High performance packet capture, Intuitive web UI, Powerful analysis and visualization, Flexible and extensible, Scales to monitor large networks.

On the other hand, CloudShark is a Network & Admin product tagged with networking, packets, analysis, pcap, troubleshooting.

Its standout features include Web-based interface for analyzing packet captures, Support for PCAP and PCAPNG file formats, Filtering and searching of packets, Extraction of files, images etc. from packet data, Statistical analysis e.g. top talkers, protocol breakdown, Annotation and commenting on packets, Sharing of packet captures, and it shines with pros like Easy to use without installing any software, Collaboration features allow teams to analyze captures together, Scales to handle large capture files, Integrates with other cloud services like Dropbox, Can access captures from anywhere with an internet connection.

Feature	Arkime	CloudShark
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Arkime

Description: Arkime is an open-source network traffic analyzer that captures packets in real-time and enables users to search, analyze and visualize network traffic. It can handle high bandwidth with the ability to capture at rates up to 40 Gbps. Arkime provides a powerful interface for forensic analysis.

CloudShark

Description: CloudShark is a cloud-based network packet analyzer that allows users to upload packet capture files and analyze them using a web browser. It provides features like filtering, extraction, statistics, search, and sharing of PCAPs.

Key Features Comparison

Arkime Features

• Real-time packet capture
• Web-based interface
• Customizable dashboards
• Alerting and reporting
• Supports various data inputs
• Scalable and distributed architecture
• Plugin support for extensibility

CloudShark Features

• Web-based interface for analyzing packet captures
• Support for PCAP and PCAPNG file formats
• Filtering and searching of packets
• Extraction of files, images etc. from packet data
• Statistical analysis e.g. top talkers, protocol breakdown
• Annotation and commenting on packets
• Sharing of packet captures

Pros & Cons Analysis

Arkime

Pros

• Open source and free
• High performance packet capture
• Intuitive web UI
• Powerful analysis and visualization
• Flexible and extensible
• Scales to monitor large networks

Cons

• Complex initial setup
• Steep learning curve
• Requires dedicated hardware
• Limited support options

CloudShark

Pros

• Easy to use without installing any software
• Collaboration features allow teams to analyze captures together
• Scales to handle large capture files
• Integrates with other cloud services like Dropbox
• Can access captures from anywhere with an internet connection

Cons

• Upload speeds can limit analyzing large captures
• Sensitive data is stored on external servers
• Advanced features may require paid plans
• Lacks some features of desktop packet analysis tools

Pricing Comparison

Arkime

• Open Source

CloudShark

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based