Atlassian Clover vs cobertura

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Atlassian Clover icon
Atlassian Clover
cobertura icon
cobertura

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Atlassian Clover and cobertura? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Atlassian Clover is a Development solution with tags like java, code-coverage, unit-testing, maven, gradle.

It boasts features such as Code coverage measurement, Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle, Statement, branch and method coverage reporting, Highlighting untested code, Enforcing code quality policies and pros including Helps improve test quality and coverage, Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines, Provides detailed coverage reports, Enables setting coverage goals.

On the other hand, cobertura is a Development product tagged with java, code-coverage, testing, maven, ant.

Its standout features include Code coverage measurement for Java programs, Integration with build tools like Maven and Ant, Identifies untested code, Generates coverage reports in multiple formats like HTML and XML, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to integrate into build process, Helps improve test quality and coverage, Widely used and well-supported.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Atlassian Clover and cobertura?

When evaluating Atlassian Clover versus cobertura, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Atlassian Clover and cobertura have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include java, code-coverage, unit-testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Atlassian Clover and cobertura significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include java, code-coverage, unit-testing, maven.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include java, code-coverage and java, code-coverage.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Atlassian Clover and cobertura. You might also explore java, code-coverage, unit-testing for alternative approaches.

Feature Atlassian Clover cobertura
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover

Description: Atlassian Clover is a code coverage tool for Java applications. It integrates with build tools like Maven and Gradle to show statement, branch, and method coverage. Clover helps developers write better unit tests and enforce code quality policies.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

cobertura
cobertura

Description: Cobertura is an open source Java code coverage tool that calculates the percentage of code accessed by tests. It shows which parts of the codebase are lacking test coverage to help developers improve test quality. Cobertura integrates with build tools like Maven and Ant.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover Features
  • Code coverage measurement
  • Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle
  • Statement, branch and method coverage reporting
  • Highlighting untested code
  • Enforcing code quality policies
cobertura
cobertura Features
  • Code coverage measurement for Java programs
  • Integration with build tools like Maven and Ant
  • Identifies untested code
  • Generates coverage reports in multiple formats like HTML and XML

Pros & Cons Analysis

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover
Pros
  • Helps improve test quality and coverage
  • Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines
  • Provides detailed coverage reports
  • Enables setting coverage goals
Cons
  • Setup can be complex
  • Reporting can be overwhelming initially
  • Limited language support (Java only)
cobertura
cobertura
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to integrate into build process
  • Helps improve test quality and coverage
  • Widely used and well-supported
Cons
  • Only for Java code
  • Configuration can be complex
  • Report generation can slow builds
  • Limited customization options

Pricing Comparison

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based
cobertura
cobertura
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs