cobertura vs EclEmma

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

cobertura icon
cobertura
EclEmma icon
EclEmma

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between cobertura and EclEmma? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

cobertura is a Development solution with tags like java, code-coverage, testing, maven, ant.

It boasts features such as Code coverage measurement for Java programs, Integration with build tools like Maven and Ant, Identifies untested code, Generates coverage reports in multiple formats like HTML and XML and pros including Free and open source, Easy to integrate into build process, Helps improve test quality and coverage, Widely used and well-supported.

On the other hand, EclEmma is a Development product tagged with eclipse, java, testing, coverage.

Its standout features include Code coverage measurement for Java code, Fast test and ability to run tests from Eclipse, Color coding to visualize code coverage, Filtering of coverage results, Integration with JUnit and TestNG unit tests, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use, Good integration with Eclipse IDE, Helpful visualization features, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare cobertura and EclEmma?

When evaluating cobertura versus EclEmma, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

cobertura and EclEmma have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include java, code-coverage, testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between cobertura and EclEmma significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include java, code-coverage, testing, maven.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include java, code-coverage and eclipse, java.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between cobertura and EclEmma. You might also explore java, code-coverage, testing for alternative approaches.

Feature cobertura EclEmma
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

cobertura
cobertura

Description: Cobertura is an open source Java code coverage tool that calculates the percentage of code accessed by tests. It shows which parts of the codebase are lacking test coverage to help developers improve test quality. Cobertura integrates with build tools like Maven and Ant.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

EclEmma
EclEmma

Description: EclEmma is a free Java code coverage tool for Eclipse, used to measure and report on code coverage in Java projects. It highlights which parts of the code have been executed during runtime.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

cobertura
cobertura Features
  • Code coverage measurement for Java programs
  • Integration with build tools like Maven and Ant
  • Identifies untested code
  • Generates coverage reports in multiple formats like HTML and XML
EclEmma
EclEmma Features
  • Code coverage measurement for Java code
  • Fast test and ability to run tests from Eclipse
  • Color coding to visualize code coverage
  • Filtering of coverage results
  • Integration with JUnit and TestNG unit tests

Pros & Cons Analysis

cobertura
cobertura
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to integrate into build process
  • Helps improve test quality and coverage
  • Widely used and well-supported
Cons
  • Only for Java code
  • Configuration can be complex
  • Report generation can slow builds
  • Limited customization options
EclEmma
EclEmma
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use
  • Good integration with Eclipse IDE
  • Helpful visualization features
  • Active community support
Cons
  • Limited to Java code coverage
  • Setup can be tricky for some projects
  • Reports lack customization options
  • Only available as an Eclipse plugin

Pricing Comparison

cobertura
cobertura
  • Open Source
EclEmma
EclEmma
  • Open Source

Get More Information

cobertura
cobertura
cobertura
Learn More About cobertura
EclEmma
EclEmma
EclEmma
Learn More About EclEmma

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Suggest smarter. Switch faster.

© 2026 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal