Atlassian Clover vs CodeCover

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Atlassian Clover icon
Atlassian Clover
CodeCover icon
CodeCover

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Atlassian Clover and CodeCover? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Atlassian Clover is a Development solution with tags like java, code-coverage, unit-testing, maven, gradle.

It boasts features such as Code coverage measurement, Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle, Statement, branch and method coverage reporting, Highlighting untested code, Enforcing code quality policies and pros including Helps improve test quality and coverage, Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines, Provides detailed coverage reports, Enables setting coverage goals.

On the other hand, CodeCover is a Development product tagged with c, c, java, c, code-coverage, testing.

Its standout features include Measures statement, branch and condition coverage, Integrates with build tools like make and ant, Generates HTML reports, Supports C, C++, Java and C# code, Command line and GUI interfaces, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Detailed code coverage reports, Language support covers major languages, Integrates into build process, Actively maintained.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Atlassian Clover and CodeCover?

When evaluating Atlassian Clover versus CodeCover, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Atlassian Clover and CodeCover have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include java, code-coverage, unit-testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Atlassian Clover and CodeCover significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include java, code-coverage, unit-testing, maven.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include java, code-coverage and c, c.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Atlassian Clover and CodeCover. You might also explore java, code-coverage, unit-testing for alternative approaches.

Feature Atlassian Clover CodeCover
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover

Description: Atlassian Clover is a code coverage tool for Java applications. It integrates with build tools like Maven and Gradle to show statement, branch, and method coverage. Clover helps developers write better unit tests and enforce code quality policies.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

CodeCover
CodeCover

Description: CodeCover is an open source code coverage analysis tool for C, C++, Java and C# programs. It provides detailed reports on code coverage metrics to help developers understand how much of their codebase is being tested.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover Features
  • Code coverage measurement
  • Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle
  • Statement, branch and method coverage reporting
  • Highlighting untested code
  • Enforcing code quality policies
CodeCover
CodeCover Features
  • Measures statement, branch and condition coverage
  • Integrates with build tools like make and ant
  • Generates HTML reports
  • Supports C, C++, Java and C# code
  • Command line and GUI interfaces

Pros & Cons Analysis

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover
Pros
  • Helps improve test quality and coverage
  • Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines
  • Provides detailed coverage reports
  • Enables setting coverage goals
Cons
  • Setup can be complex
  • Reporting can be overwhelming initially
  • Limited language support (Java only)
CodeCover
CodeCover
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Detailed code coverage reports
  • Language support covers major languages
  • Integrates into build process
  • Actively maintained
Cons
  • Limited to line coverage only
  • Setup can be complex
  • Lacks some advanced analysis features of commercial tools

Pricing Comparison

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based
CodeCover
CodeCover
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs