Automake vs Ninja Build

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Automake icon
Automake
Ninja Build icon
Ninja Build

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Automake and Ninja Build? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Automake is a Development solution with tags like make, automake, build, gnu.

It boasts features such as Automatically generates Makefile.am files from Makefile.in files, Supports automatic dependency tracking and parallel builds, Integrates with Autoconf to provide a full build environment, Supports various languages like C, C++, Fortran, Java, Objective-C, Handles library dependencies and subdirectories seamlessly, Allows overriding defaults and customization through config files and pros including Saves time by automating Makefile creation, Promotes standardization and best practices for builds, Simplifies build configuration for large, complex projects, Easy to integrate with build tools like Autoconf and Libtool, Actively maintained and well-documented.

On the other hand, Ninja Build is a Development product tagged with compiler, build-system, cc.

Its standout features include Fast build system, Built-in dependency analysis, Parallel execution, Minimal project configuration, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Very fast build times, Simple and easy to use, Good for small to medium sized projects, Active development and support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Automake and Ninja Build?

When evaluating Automake versus Ninja Build, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Automake and Ninja Build have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include make, automake, build.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Automake and Ninja Build significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include make, automake, build, gnu.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include make, automake and compiler, build-system.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Automake and Ninja Build. You might also explore make, automake, build for alternative approaches.

Feature Automake Ninja Build
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Automake
Automake

Description: Automake is a tool for automatically generating Makefile.am files that comply with the GNU coding standards. It simplifies the creation and maintenance of Makefiles for complex software projects.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Ninja Build
Ninja Build

Description: Ninja is a small, fast build system designed for compiling code quickly. It focuses on speed and supports parallel execution for very fast builds using multiple CPU cores.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Automake
Automake Features
  • Automatically generates Makefile.am files from Makefile.in files
  • Supports automatic dependency tracking and parallel builds
  • Integrates with Autoconf to provide a full build environment
  • Supports various languages like C, C++, Fortran, Java, Objective-C
  • Handles library dependencies and subdirectories seamlessly
  • Allows overriding defaults and customization through config files
Ninja Build
Ninja Build Features
  • Fast build system
  • Built-in dependency analysis
  • Parallel execution
  • Minimal project configuration
  • Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Automake
Automake
Pros
  • Saves time by automating Makefile creation
  • Promotes standardization and best practices for builds
  • Simplifies build configuration for large, complex projects
  • Easy to integrate with build tools like Autoconf and Libtool
  • Actively maintained and well-documented
Cons
  • Yet another build tool to learn
  • Limited flexibility compared to handwritten Makefiles
  • Not as feature-rich as some alternatives like CMake
  • Requires GNU build tools and may not work on all platforms
  • Can have a steep learning curve
Ninja Build
Ninja Build
Pros
  • Very fast build times
  • Simple and easy to use
  • Good for small to medium sized projects
  • Active development and support
Cons
  • Limited features compared to larger build tools
  • Less customizable than other build tools
  • Lacks GUI or IDE integration

Pricing Comparison

Automake
Automake
  • Open Source
Ninja Build
Ninja Build
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Automake
Automake
Automake
Learn More About Automake
Ninja Build
Ninja Build
Ninja Build
Learn More About Ninja Build

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Find your fit.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal