Struggling to choose between Automake and Ninja Build? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
Automake is a Development solution with tags like make, automake, build, gnu.
It boasts features such as Automatically generates Makefile.am files from Makefile.in files, Supports automatic dependency tracking and parallel builds, Integrates with Autoconf to provide a full build environment, Supports various languages like C, C++, Fortran, Java, Objective-C, Handles library dependencies and subdirectories seamlessly, Allows overriding defaults and customization through config files and pros including Saves time by automating Makefile creation, Promotes standardization and best practices for builds, Simplifies build configuration for large, complex projects, Easy to integrate with build tools like Autoconf and Libtool, Actively maintained and well-documented.
On the other hand, Ninja Build is a Development product tagged with compiler, build-system, cc.
Its standout features include Fast build system, Built-in dependency analysis, Parallel execution, Minimal project configuration, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Very fast build times, Simple and easy to use, Good for small to medium sized projects, Active development and support.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
Automake is a tool for automatically generating Makefile.am files that comply with the GNU coding standards. It simplifies the creation and maintenance of Makefiles for complex software projects.
Ninja is a small, fast build system designed for compiling code quickly. It focuses on speed and supports parallel execution for very fast builds using multiple CPU cores.