Automake vs Meson

Struggling to choose between Automake and Meson? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Automake is a Development solution with tags like make, automake, build, gnu.

It boasts features such as Automatically generates Makefile.am files from Makefile.in files, Supports automatic dependency tracking and parallel builds, Integrates with Autoconf to provide a full build environment, Supports various languages like C, C++, Fortran, Java, Objective-C, Handles library dependencies and subdirectories seamlessly, Allows overriding defaults and customization through config files and pros including Saves time by automating Makefile creation, Promotes standardization and best practices for builds, Simplifies build configuration for large, complex projects, Easy to integrate with build tools like Autoconf and Libtool, Actively maintained and well-documented.

On the other hand, Meson is a Development product tagged with build-system, compiler, open-source.

Its standout features include Fast build times, Intuitive syntax, Cross-platform support, Integration with popular build tools and languages, Dependency management, Support for tests and benchmarks, Customizable build configuration, and it shines with pros like Very fast compared to other build systems, Simple configuration using Python DSL, Easy to use and learn, Detects changes quickly to avoid unnecessary rebuilds, Good error messages, Lightweight with few dependencies.

Feature	Automake	Meson
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Automake

Description: Automake is a tool for automatically generating Makefile.am files that comply with the GNU coding standards. It simplifies the creation and maintenance of Makefiles for complex software projects.

Meson

Description: Meson is an open-source build system focused on speed and ease of use. It is designed to optimize the build process by detecting changes in projects faster and providing useful error messages. Meson supports many languages and build tools.

Key Features Comparison

Automake Features

• Automatically generates Makefile.am files from Makefile.in files
• Supports automatic dependency tracking and parallel builds
• Integrates with Autoconf to provide a full build environment
• Supports various languages like C, C++, Fortran, Java, Objective-C
• Handles library dependencies and subdirectories seamlessly
• Allows overriding defaults and customization through config files

Meson Features

• Fast build times
• Intuitive syntax
• Cross-platform support
• Integration with popular build tools and languages
• Dependency management
• Support for tests and benchmarks
• Customizable build configuration

Pros & Cons Analysis

Automake

Pros

• Saves time by automating Makefile creation
• Promotes standardization and best practices for builds
• Simplifies build configuration for large, complex projects
• Easy to integrate with build tools like Autoconf and Libtool
• Actively maintained and well-documented

Cons

• Yet another build tool to learn
• Limited flexibility compared to handwritten Makefiles
• Not as feature-rich as some alternatives like CMake
• Requires GNU build tools and may not work on all platforms
• Can have a steep learning curve

Meson

Pros

• Very fast compared to other build systems
• Simple configuration using Python DSL
• Easy to use and learn
• Detects changes quickly to avoid unnecessary rebuilds
• Good error messages
• Lightweight with few dependencies

Cons

• Limited adoption outside C/C++ projects
• Less flexibility than some other build tools
• Lacks some advanced features of tools like CMake
• Less third-party integration compared to older systems

Pricing Comparison

Automake

• Open Source

Meson

• Open Source