Bazel vs CMake

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Bazel icon
Bazel
CMake icon
CMake

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Bazel and CMake? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bazel is a Development solution with tags like build-tool, incremental-builds, multilanguage.

It boasts features such as Fast, incremental builds, Scales to very large codebases, Language-agnostic, Hermetic and reproducible builds, Supports multiple platforms and pros including Very fast build times, Easily build large projects, Reproducible builds, Language-agnostic, Active open source community.

On the other hand, CMake is a Development product tagged with build, compile, crossplatform, open-source.

Its standout features include Cross-platform build system, Generate native makefiles and workspaces, Support multiple compilers and IDEs, Modular architecture, Customizable and extensible, and it shines with pros like Simplifies build process across platforms, Compiler-independent builds, Large user and developer community, Widely used and well-supported, Highly customizable.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Bazel and CMake?

When evaluating Bazel versus CMake, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Bazel and CMake have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include build-tool, incremental-builds, multilanguage.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Bazel and CMake significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include build-tool, incremental-builds, multilanguage.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include build-tool, incremental-builds and build, compile.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Bazel and CMake. You might also explore build-tool, incremental-builds, multilanguage for alternative approaches.

Feature Bazel CMake
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Bazel
Bazel

Description: Bazel is an open-source build and test tool similar to Make, Maven, or Gradle. It is optimized for building large, multi-language software projects efficiently by incrementally building only what has changed.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

CMake
CMake

Description: CMake is an open-source, cross-platform tool designed to build, test, and package software. It works by generating native makefiles and workspaces to automate the build process using a compiler-independent method.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Bazel
Bazel Features
  • Fast, incremental builds
  • Scales to very large codebases
  • Language-agnostic
  • Hermetic and reproducible builds
  • Supports multiple platforms
CMake
CMake Features
  • Cross-platform build system
  • Generate native makefiles and workspaces
  • Support multiple compilers and IDEs
  • Modular architecture
  • Customizable and extensible

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bazel
Bazel
Pros
  • Very fast build times
  • Easily build large projects
  • Reproducible builds
  • Language-agnostic
  • Active open source community
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Requires buy-in from entire team
  • Not as feature-rich as alternatives like Gradle
CMake
CMake
Pros
  • Simplifies build process across platforms
  • Compiler-independent builds
  • Large user and developer community
  • Widely used and well-supported
  • Highly customizable
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Complex syntax and concepts
  • Poor documentation
  • Limited IDE integration on some platforms
  • Build times can be slow for large projects

Pricing Comparison

Bazel
Bazel
  • Open Source
CMake
CMake
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs