bhyve vs KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine)

Struggling to choose between bhyve and KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

bhyve is a System & Hardware solution with tags like hypervisor, virtualization, virtual-machines, freebsd.

It boasts features such as Supports virtualization of x86-64 guest operating systems, Utilizes hardware virtualization capabilities on AMD and Intel CPUs, Supports UEFI firmware for guest VMs, PCI passthrough allows direct access to physical hardware from guest VMs, SMP allows configuring multiple virtual CPUs for guest VMs, virtio drivers provide high performance network and disk I/O, Live migration moves running VMs between hosts and pros including Free and open source software, Good performance and low overhead, Supports modern virtualization features, Integrated into FreeBSD for ease of use and management.

On the other hand, KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a System & Hardware product tagged with virtualization, vm, linux, open-source.

Its standout features include Kernel-level virtualization, Supports live migration of VMs between hosts, Built into Linux kernel, Leverages hardware-assisted virtualization, Open source and free, and it shines with pros like Good performance, Leverages hardware virtualization, Integrated into Linux, Active development community, Free and open source.

Feature	bhyve	KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine)
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	System & Hardware	System & Hardware

Product Overview

bhyve

Description: bhyve is an open-source hypervisor that allows users to run multiple operating systems as virtual machines on FreeBSD. It supports features like UEFI firmware, PCI passthrough, SMP, virtio drivers and more.

KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine)

Description: KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is an open-source virtualization technology that allows you to create and run virtual machines (VMs) on Linux. It makes use of hardware virtualization capabilities of modern CPUs for efficient virtualization.

Key Features Comparison

bhyve Features

• Supports virtualization of x86-64 guest operating systems
• Utilizes hardware virtualization capabilities on AMD and Intel CPUs
• Supports UEFI firmware for guest VMs
• PCI passthrough allows direct access to physical hardware from guest VMs
• SMP allows configuring multiple virtual CPUs for guest VMs
• virtio drivers provide high performance network and disk I/O
• Live migration moves running VMs between hosts

KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) Features

• Kernel-level virtualization
• Supports live migration of VMs between hosts
• Built into Linux kernel
• Leverages hardware-assisted virtualization
• Open source and free

Pros & Cons Analysis

bhyve

Pros

• Free and open source software
• Good performance and low overhead
• Supports modern virtualization features
• Integrated into FreeBSD for ease of use and management

Cons

• Only runs on FreeBSD hosts
• Limited management tools compared to other hypervisors
• Less extensive documentation and community support
• Fewer guest OS support than alternatives like KVM

KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine)

Pros

• Good performance
• Leverages hardware virtualization
• Integrated into Linux
• Active development community
• Free and open source

Cons

• Linux-only
• Less features than proprietary solutions
• Steeper learning curve than alternatives
• No centralized management

Pricing Comparison

bhyve

• Open Source

KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine)

• Open Source
• Free