Bitbucket vs Gitolite

Struggling to choose between Bitbucket and Gitolite? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bitbucket is a Development solution with tags like git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

It boasts features such as Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc and pros including Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

On the other hand, Gitolite is a Development product tagged with git, access-control, repositories.

Its standout features include Fine-grained access control for Git repositories, Allows specifying users with read, write, or admin access per repo, Role-based access control, Hooks for custom authorization rules, Audit logging, Branch-level access restrictions, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Easy to setup and use, Powerful access control features, Open source with active development, Integrates well with Git workflow.

Feature	Bitbucket	Gitolite
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Bitbucket

Description: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Gitolite

Description: Gitolite is a Git server that provides fine-grained access control for managing Git repositories. It allows admins to specify which users have read, write, or admin access to individual repositories.

Key Features Comparison

Bitbucket Features

• Git and Mercurial version control
• Pull requests for code review
• Issue tracking
• Code search
• Wikis for documentation
• Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Gitolite Features

• Fine-grained access control for Git repositories
• Allows specifying users with read, write, or admin access per repo
• Role-based access control
• Hooks for custom authorization rules
• Audit logging
• Branch-level access restrictions

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bitbucket

Pros

• Unlimited private repositories for small teams
• Great integration with other Atlassian products
• Powerful branch permissions and workflows
• Fast and reliable performance

Cons

• Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan
• Missing some features of GitHub like social coding
• Web interface not as polished as GitHub

Gitolite

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Easy to setup and use
• Powerful access control features
• Open source with active development
• Integrates well with Git workflow

Cons

• Limited UI and dashboard features
• Steeper learning curve than some alternatives
• Access control can get complex with large teams
• Not ideal for hosting public repositories

Pricing Comparison

Bitbucket

• Free
• Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
• Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

Gitolite

• Open Source