Bitbucket vs gitstorage

Struggling to choose between Bitbucket and gitstorage? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bitbucket is a Development solution with tags like git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

It boasts features such as Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc and pros including Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

On the other hand, gitstorage is a Development product tagged with git, selfhosted, repositories, workflows.

Its standout features include Self-hosted Git repository hosting, Web UI for managing repositories, User management and access controls, Repository/branch permissions, Issue tracking, Wikis, Pull request reviews, CI/CD pipelines, Built-in Docker registry, and it shines with pros like Full control and customization as self-hosted, No limits on private repositories, Can keep data on-premises, Lower cost than cloud for large # of repos, Integrates with existing infrastructure.

Feature	Bitbucket	gitstorage
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Bitbucket

Description: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

gitstorage

Description: gitstorage is a self-hosted alternative to GitHub and GitLab that allows you to host Git repositories on your own server. It has a simple, clean interface focused on efficient Git workflows.

Key Features Comparison

Bitbucket Features

• Git and Mercurial version control
• Pull requests for code review
• Issue tracking
• Code search
• Wikis for documentation
• Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

gitstorage Features

• Self-hosted Git repository hosting
• Web UI for managing repositories
• User management and access controls
• Repository/branch permissions
• Issue tracking
• Wikis
• Pull request reviews
• CI/CD pipelines
• Built-in Docker registry

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bitbucket

Pros

• Unlimited private repositories for small teams
• Great integration with other Atlassian products
• Powerful branch permissions and workflows
• Fast and reliable performance

Cons

• Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan
• Missing some features of GitHub like social coding
• Web interface not as polished as GitHub

gitstorage

Pros

• Full control and customization as self-hosted
• No limits on private repositories
• Can keep data on-premises
• Lower cost than cloud for large # of repos
• Integrates with existing infrastructure

Cons

• Requires maintaining your own server(s)
• Lacks some features of GitHub/GitLab
• Steeper learning curve for setup/admin
• Upgrades can require more effort

Pricing Comparison

Bitbucket

• Free
• Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
• Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

gitstorage

• Open Source