Bitbucket vs Google Code Hosting

Struggling to choose between Bitbucket and Google Code Hosting? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bitbucket is a Development solution with tags like git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

It boasts features such as Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc and pros including Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

On the other hand, Google Code Hosting is a Development product tagged with git, subversion, source-code, repository, hosting.

Its standout features include Hosted Git and Subversion repositories, Issue tracking, Wiki for documentation, Access control for public/private repositories, Code browsing and search, Customizable webhooks and services, Download/upload via HTTPS, SSH, Project downloads and statistics, and it shines with pros like Free and unlimited public repositories, Integrated issue tracking and wiki, Fast performance, Easy to use interface, Backed by Google infrastructure.

Feature	Bitbucket	Google Code Hosting
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Bitbucket

Description: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Google Code Hosting

Description: Google Code Hosting was a free web-based source code repository hosted by Google. It opened in 2006 and closed in 2016. It offered Git and Subversion version control and a bug tracker.

Key Features Comparison

Bitbucket Features

• Git and Mercurial version control
• Pull requests for code review
• Issue tracking
• Code search
• Wikis for documentation
• Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Google Code Hosting Features

• Hosted Git and Subversion repositories
• Issue tracking
• Wiki for documentation
• Access control for public/private repositories
• Code browsing and search
• Customizable webhooks and services
• Download/upload via HTTPS, SSH
• Project downloads and statistics

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bitbucket

Pros

• Unlimited private repositories for small teams
• Great integration with other Atlassian products
• Powerful branch permissions and workflows
• Fast and reliable performance

Cons

• Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan
• Missing some features of GitHub like social coding
• Web interface not as polished as GitHub

Google Code Hosting

Pros

• Free and unlimited public repositories
• Integrated issue tracking and wiki
• Fast performance
• Easy to use interface
• Backed by Google infrastructure

Cons

• Limited to open source projects
• No desktop client
• Only Git and Subversion support
• Discontinued in 2016 with short notice

Pricing Comparison

Bitbucket

• Free
• Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
• Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

Google Code Hosting

• Free