Bitbucket vs Google Code Hosting

Struggling to choose between Bitbucket and Google Code Hosting? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bitbucket is a Development solution with tags like git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

It boasts features such as Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc and pros including Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

On the other hand, Google Code Hosting is a Development product tagged with git, subversion, source-code, repository, hosting.

Its standout features include Hosted Git and Subversion repositories, Issue tracking, Wiki for documentation, Access control for public/private repositories, Code browsing and search, Customizable webhooks and services, Download/upload via HTTPS, SSH, Project downloads and statistics, and it shines with pros like Free and unlimited public repositories, Integrated issue tracking and wiki, Fast performance, Easy to use interface, Backed by Google infrastructure.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Categories:
git mercurial repository version-control

Bitbucket Features

  1. Git and Mercurial version control
  2. Pull requests for code review
  3. Issue tracking
  4. Code search
  5. Wikis for documentation
  6. Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Pricing

  • Free
  • Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
  • Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

Pros

Unlimited private repositories for small teams

Great integration with other Atlassian products

Powerful branch permissions and workflows

Fast and reliable performance

Cons

Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan

Missing some features of GitHub like social coding

Web interface not as polished as GitHub


Google Code Hosting

Google Code Hosting

Google Code Hosting was a free web-based source code repository hosted by Google. It opened in 2006 and closed in 2016. It offered Git and Subversion version control and a bug tracker.

Categories:
git subversion source-code repository hosting

Google Code Hosting Features

  1. Hosted Git and Subversion repositories
  2. Issue tracking
  3. Wiki for documentation
  4. Access control for public/private repositories
  5. Code browsing and search
  6. Customizable webhooks and services
  7. Download/upload via HTTPS, SSH
  8. Project downloads and statistics

Pricing

  • Free

Pros

Free and unlimited public repositories

Integrated issue tracking and wiki

Fast performance

Easy to use interface

Backed by Google infrastructure

Cons

Limited to open source projects

No desktop client

Only Git and Subversion support

Discontinued in 2016 with short notice