Bitbucket vs RhodeCode

Struggling to choose between Bitbucket and RhodeCode? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bitbucket is a Development solution with tags like git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

It boasts features such as Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc and pros including Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

On the other hand, RhodeCode is a Development product tagged with git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

Its standout features include Web-based interface for managing Git/Mercurial repositories, Access control and permissions management, Code review and pull requests, Issue tracking, Wiki pages, REST API, Plugins and extensions, and it shines with pros like Easy to use interface, Supports multiple version control systems, Scales for large projects and teams, Flexible access controls, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines, Open source and self-hosted.

Feature	Bitbucket	RhodeCode
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Bitbucket

Description: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

RhodeCode

Description: RhodeCode is an open source platform for hosting and managing Git and Mercurial repositories. It provides a web interface and integration with common version control workflows.

Key Features Comparison

Bitbucket Features

• Git and Mercurial version control
• Pull requests for code review
• Issue tracking
• Code search
• Wikis for documentation
• Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

RhodeCode Features

• Web-based interface for managing Git/Mercurial repositories
• Access control and permissions management
• Code review and pull requests
• Issue tracking
• Wiki pages
• REST API
• Plugins and extensions

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bitbucket

Pros

• Unlimited private repositories for small teams
• Great integration with other Atlassian products
• Powerful branch permissions and workflows
• Fast and reliable performance

Cons

• Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan
• Missing some features of GitHub like social coding
• Web interface not as polished as GitHub

RhodeCode

Pros

• Easy to use interface
• Supports multiple version control systems
• Scales for large projects and teams
• Flexible access controls
• Integrates with CI/CD pipelines
• Open source and self-hosted

Cons

• Limited native integrations compared to GitHub/GitLab
• Less extensible than GitLab
• Smaller user community than alternatives
• Not ideal for managing binary files

Pricing Comparison

Bitbucket

• Free
• Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
• Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

RhodeCode

• Open Source