Bodymovin vs Snap.svg

Struggling to choose between Bodymovin and Snap.svg? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bodymovin is a Video & Movies solution with tags like after-effects, animation, html5, json.

It boasts features such as Exports After Effects animations as JSON data, Allows animations to be rendered in HTML5, Supports vector animations and shapes, Can export animations as SVG or canvas elements, Includes a player for rendering animations, Integrates with popular JS animation libraries like Lottie, Open source and free and pros including Lightweight method to render complex AE animations for web, Much smaller file sizes compared to video formats, Animations remain vector based for scaling, Easily integrate motion design into web projects, Good performance even on mobile devices, Active development and support.

On the other hand, Snap.svg is a Photos & Graphics product tagged with svg, graphics, editing, animation.

Its standout features include Wraps SVG elements into SVGObject for easy manipulation, Supports animations and transformations, Offers utility functions like matrix transformations, bounding box calculations, etc, Works across modern browsers, Lightweight at just a few KB, and it shines with pros like Easy to use API, Good documentation and examples, Active development and support, Good browser support, Lightweight and fast.

Feature	Bodymovin	Snap.svg
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Video & Movies	Photos & Graphics

Product Overview

Bodymovin

Description: Bodymovin is an After Effects plugin that allows you to export After Effects animations to JSON data that can be used to recreate the animations in HTML5.

Snap.svg

Description: Snap.svg is a JavaScript library for working with SVG graphics. It provides an easy API for creating, modifying, and animating SVGs, allowing developers to easily integrate vector graphics into web pages.

Key Features Comparison

Bodymovin Features

• Exports After Effects animations as JSON data
• Allows animations to be rendered in HTML5
• Supports vector animations and shapes
• Can export animations as SVG or canvas elements
• Includes a player for rendering animations
• Integrates with popular JS animation libraries like Lottie
• Open source and free

Snap.svg Features

• Wraps SVG elements into SVGObject for easy manipulation
• Supports animations and transformations
• Offers utility functions like matrix transformations, bounding box calculations, etc
• Works across modern browsers
• Lightweight at just a few KB

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bodymovin

Pros

• Lightweight method to render complex AE animations for web
• Much smaller file sizes compared to video formats
• Animations remain vector based for scaling
• Easily integrate motion design into web projects
• Good performance even on mobile devices
• Active development and support

Cons

• Only exports what is supported by HTML5 canvas/SVG
• More limited than native AE project format
• Requires specific player library for rendering
• Less customizable compared to code-based web animations
• Limited browser support in some cases

Snap.svg

Pros

• Easy to use API
• Good documentation and examples
• Active development and support
• Good browser support
• Lightweight and fast

Cons

• Limited to SVG, not a full graphics library
• Less flexible than D3.js for data visualizations
• Only handles SVG, not generation or rasterization
• No React integration out of the box

Pricing Comparison

Bodymovin

• Open Source

Snap.svg

• Open Source