Browserling vs Retest

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Browserling icon
Browserling
Retest icon
Retest

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Browserling and Retest? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Browserling is a Web Browsers solution with tags like crossbrowser, testing, emulation.

It boasts features such as Cross-browser testing, Test website on multiple browsers, Emulates various browser and OS configurations, Live interactive browser testing, Screenshot comparisons, Mobile browser testing, Browser version testing, Browser compatibility testing and pros including Test across many browsers and OS, No need to install browsers locally, Easy to use interface, Good for quick testing, Affordable pricing.

On the other hand, Retest is a Development product tagged with test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing, mobile-testing, crossbrowser-testing, open-source.

Its standout features include Record and playback tests, Cross-browser testing, Mobile testing, Visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, Test maintenance and debugging, Open source and self-hosted, and it shines with pros like Easy to use recorder, Supports many browsers and devices, Visual testing for UI changes, Active open source community, Self-hosted option available.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Browserling and Retest?

When evaluating Browserling versus Retest, both solutions serve different needs within the web browsers ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Browserling and Retest have established themselves in the web browsers market. Key areas include crossbrowser, testing, emulation.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Browserling and Retest significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include crossbrowser, testing, emulation.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include crossbrowser, testing and test-automation, regression-testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Browserling and Retest. You might also explore crossbrowser, testing, emulation for alternative approaches.

Feature Browserling Retest
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Web Browsers Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Browserling
Browserling

Description: Browserling is a cross-browser testing tool that allows you to test your website in multiple browsers online. It emulates various browser and operating system configurations so you can see how your site looks and functions across different environments.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Retest
Retest

Description: Retest is an open-source test automation tool for regression testing web and mobile applications. It supports multiple browsers and devices for cross-browser testing and provides easy test recording, editing, maintenance and debugging.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Browserling
Browserling Features
  • Cross-browser testing
  • Test website on multiple browsers
  • Emulates various browser and OS configurations
  • Live interactive browser testing
  • Screenshot comparisons
  • Mobile browser testing
  • Browser version testing
  • Browser compatibility testing
Retest
Retest Features
  • Record and playback tests
  • Cross-browser testing
  • Mobile testing
  • Visual regression testing
  • CI/CD integration
  • Test maintenance and debugging
  • Open source and self-hosted

Pros & Cons Analysis

Browserling
Browserling
Pros
  • Test across many browsers and OS
  • No need to install browsers locally
  • Easy to use interface
  • Good for quick testing
  • Affordable pricing
Cons
  • Limited testing time on free plan
  • No automated testing
  • No detailed error logging
  • Not meant for comprehensive testing
Retest
Retest
Pros
  • Easy to use recorder
  • Supports many browsers and devices
  • Visual testing for UI changes
  • Active open source community
  • Self-hosted option available
Cons
  • Limited built-in reporting
  • Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
  • Mobile testing requires emulator/simulator
  • Lacks some enterprise-level features

Pricing Comparison

Browserling
Browserling
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based
Retest
Retest
  • Free
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs