Buildr vs GNU Make

Struggling to choose between Buildr and GNU Make? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Buildr is a Development solution with tags like ruby, java, c, scala, build, automation.

It boasts features such as Ruby DSL for build configuration, Supports multiple languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Clojure, C/C++, Built-in support for testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, Specs, Parallel builds, Built-in dependency management, IDE integration, Continuous integration support and pros including Simple and expressive Ruby DSL, Cross-platform and cross-language support, Active open source community, Integrates well with other tools, Fast parallel builds.

On the other hand, GNU Make is a Development product tagged with build, automation, make, compiler.

Its standout features include Dependency tracking - Automatically determines dependencies between files, Parallel builds - Can build independent targets simultaneously, Built-in functions - Many built-in functions for common build tasks, Recursive builds - Can build targets in subdirectories recursively, Pattern rules - General rules can be applied based on pattern matching, Conditionals - Supports if/else conditionals in makefiles, and it shines with pros like Widely used and well-supported, Mature and stable, Powerful dependency tracking, Built-in parallelism, Portable across platforms, Integrates well with other tools.

Feature	Buildr	GNU Make
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Buildr

Description: Buildr is an open-source software build system and project automation tool. It is written in Ruby and is designed for building Java, C/C++, Ruby, Scala and other language projects with ease. Buildr handles compilation, packaging, testing, and deployment.

GNU Make

Description: GNU Make is a utility that automatically builds executable programs and libraries from source code by reading files called Makefiles which specify how to derive the target program. It allows users to easily compile large projects without manually issuing the compilation commands.

Key Features Comparison

Buildr Features

• Ruby DSL for build configuration
• Supports multiple languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Clojure, C/C++
• Built-in support for testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, Specs
• Parallel builds
• Built-in dependency management
• IDE integration
• Continuous integration support

GNU Make Features

• Dependency tracking - Automatically determines dependencies between files
• Parallel builds - Can build independent targets simultaneously
• Built-in functions - Many built-in functions for common build tasks
• Recursive builds - Can build targets in subdirectories recursively
• Pattern rules - General rules can be applied based on pattern matching
• Conditionals - Supports if/else conditionals in makefiles

Pros & Cons Analysis

Buildr

Pros

• Simple and expressive Ruby DSL
• Cross-platform and cross-language support
• Active open source community
• Integrates well with other tools
• Fast parallel builds

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Ruby DSL
• Limited adoption compared to Maven/Gradle
• Not as feature-rich as some alternatives

GNU Make

Pros

• Widely used and well-supported
• Mature and stable
• Powerful dependency tracking
• Built-in parallelism
• Portable across platforms
• Integrates well with other tools

Cons

• Cryptic syntax
• Difficult for complex builds
• Only rebuilds out-of-date targets
• Not suitable for all project types
• Limited to makefile build process

Pricing Comparison

Buildr

• Open Source

GNU Make

• Open Source