CMU Common Lisp vs LispWorks

Struggling to choose between CMU Common Lisp and LispWorks? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CMU Common Lisp is a Development solution with tags like common-lisp, lisp, programming-language.

It boasts features such as Native code compiler, Foreign function interface, Documentation generation tools, Garbage collection, Object-oriented programming support, Macro system, Debugging and profiling tools and pros including High performance, Mature and stable, Good documentation, Active community support, Free and open source.

On the other hand, LispWorks is a Development product tagged with lisp, common-lisp, ide, compiler, debugger.

Its standout features include Integrated Development Environment (IDE), Common Lisp compiler and debugger, GUI application development tools, Web application development tools, Cross-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux), Extensive libraries and tools for building complex applications, Powerful debugging and profiling capabilities, Integrated version control support, Customizable editor with syntax highlighting and code completion, Distributed computing and remote development capabilities, and it shines with pros like Comprehensive development environment for Common Lisp, Robust and mature toolset for building complex applications, Cross-platform support for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Strong community and extensive documentation, Excellent performance and scalability, Integrated support for GUI and web development.

Feature	CMU Common Lisp	LispWorks
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

CMU Common Lisp

Description: CMU Common Lisp is an open source implementation of the Common Lisp programming language developed at Carnegie Mellon University. It features an optimizing native code compiler, a foreign function interface, and tools for generating documentation.

LispWorks

Description: LispWorks is a complete Common Lisp development environment that includes an integrated development environment, a compiler and debugger, as well as extensive tools for building GUI applications, web applications, and more.

Key Features Comparison

CMU Common Lisp Features

• Native code compiler
• Foreign function interface
• Documentation generation tools
• Garbage collection
• Object-oriented programming support
• Macro system
• Debugging and profiling tools

LispWorks Features

• Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
• Common Lisp compiler and debugger
• GUI application development tools
• Web application development tools
• Cross-platform support (Windows, macOS, Linux)
• Extensive libraries and tools for building complex applications
• Powerful debugging and profiling capabilities
• Integrated version control support
• Customizable editor with syntax highlighting and code completion
• Distributed computing and remote development capabilities

Pros & Cons Analysis

CMU Common Lisp

Pros

• High performance
• Mature and stable
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Free and open source

Cons

• Not as widely used as some other Lisps
• Less libraries/packages than more popular Lisps
• Older codebase
• Limited platform support

LispWorks

Pros

• Comprehensive development environment for Common Lisp
• Robust and mature toolset for building complex applications
• Cross-platform support for Windows, macOS, and Linux
• Strong community and extensive documentation
• Excellent performance and scalability
• Integrated support for GUI and web development

Cons

• Relatively high cost compared to some other Lisp environments
• Steeper learning curve for developers new to Lisp
• Limited free or open-source options available
• May not have the same level of community support as some other Lisp implementations

Pricing Comparison

CMU Common Lisp

• Open Source

LispWorks

• Subscription-Based