CMU Common Lisp vs femtolisp

Struggling to choose between CMU Common Lisp and femtolisp? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CMU Common Lisp is a Development solution with tags like common-lisp, lisp, programming-language.

It boasts features such as Native code compiler, Foreign function interface, Documentation generation tools, Garbage collection, Object-oriented programming support, Macro system, Debugging and profiling tools and pros including High performance, Mature and stable, Good documentation, Active community support, Free and open source.

On the other hand, femtolisp is a Development product tagged with lisp, interpreter, embeddable, lightweight.

Its standout features include Minimal Lisp interpreter and scripting language, Implemented in C, Lightweight and customizable, Easily embeddable into other applications, Small memory footprint, Provides basic Lisp semantics, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Easy to embed and extend, Good for scripting simple tasks, Beginner friendly introduction to Lisp.

Feature	CMU Common Lisp	femtolisp
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

CMU Common Lisp

Description: CMU Common Lisp is an open source implementation of the Common Lisp programming language developed at Carnegie Mellon University. It features an optimizing native code compiler, a foreign function interface, and tools for generating documentation.

femtolisp

Description: Femtolisp is a minimal Lisp interpreter and scripting language implemented in C. It is focused on being lightweight, customizable, and easily embeddable into other applications. It has a small memory footprint and provides basic Lisp semantics.

Key Features Comparison

CMU Common Lisp Features

• Native code compiler
• Foreign function interface
• Documentation generation tools
• Garbage collection
• Object-oriented programming support
• Macro system
• Debugging and profiling tools

femtolisp Features

• Minimal Lisp interpreter and scripting language
• Implemented in C
• Lightweight and customizable
• Easily embeddable into other applications
• Small memory footprint
• Provides basic Lisp semantics

Pros & Cons Analysis

CMU Common Lisp

Pros

• High performance
• Mature and stable
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Free and open source

Cons

• Not as widely used as some other Lisps
• Less libraries/packages than more popular Lisps
• Older codebase
• Limited platform support

femtolisp

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Easy to embed and extend
• Good for scripting simple tasks
• Beginner friendly introduction to Lisp

Cons

• Limited features compared to full Lisp implementations
• Less mature and supported than other scripting languages
• Not suitable for large applications
• Limited libraries and ecosystem

Pricing Comparison

CMU Common Lisp

• Open Source

femtolisp

• Open Source