CodeCover vs Atlassian Clover

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

CodeCover icon
CodeCover
Atlassian Clover icon
Atlassian Clover

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between CodeCover and Atlassian Clover? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CodeCover is a Development solution with tags like c, c, java, c, code-coverage, testing.

It boasts features such as Measures statement, branch and condition coverage, Integrates with build tools like make and ant, Generates HTML reports, Supports C, C++, Java and C# code, Command line and GUI interfaces and pros including Free and open source, Detailed code coverage reports, Language support covers major languages, Integrates into build process, Actively maintained.

On the other hand, Atlassian Clover is a Development product tagged with java, code-coverage, unit-testing, maven, gradle.

Its standout features include Code coverage measurement, Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle, Statement, branch and method coverage reporting, Highlighting untested code, Enforcing code quality policies, and it shines with pros like Helps improve test quality and coverage, Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines, Provides detailed coverage reports, Enables setting coverage goals.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare CodeCover and Atlassian Clover?

When evaluating CodeCover versus Atlassian Clover, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

CodeCover and Atlassian Clover have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include c, c, java.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between CodeCover and Atlassian Clover significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include c, c, java, c.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include c, c and java, code-coverage.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between CodeCover and Atlassian Clover. You might also explore c, c, java for alternative approaches.

Feature CodeCover Atlassian Clover
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

CodeCover
CodeCover

Description: CodeCover is an open source code coverage analysis tool for C, C++, Java and C# programs. It provides detailed reports on code coverage metrics to help developers understand how much of their codebase is being tested.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover

Description: Atlassian Clover is a code coverage tool for Java applications. It integrates with build tools like Maven and Gradle to show statement, branch, and method coverage. Clover helps developers write better unit tests and enforce code quality policies.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

CodeCover
CodeCover Features
  • Measures statement, branch and condition coverage
  • Integrates with build tools like make and ant
  • Generates HTML reports
  • Supports C, C++, Java and C# code
  • Command line and GUI interfaces
Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover Features
  • Code coverage measurement
  • Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle
  • Statement, branch and method coverage reporting
  • Highlighting untested code
  • Enforcing code quality policies

Pros & Cons Analysis

CodeCover
CodeCover
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Detailed code coverage reports
  • Language support covers major languages
  • Integrates into build process
  • Actively maintained
Cons
  • Limited to line coverage only
  • Setup can be complex
  • Lacks some advanced analysis features of commercial tools
Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover
Pros
  • Helps improve test quality and coverage
  • Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines
  • Provides detailed coverage reports
  • Enables setting coverage goals
Cons
  • Setup can be complex
  • Reporting can be overwhelming initially
  • Limited language support (Java only)

Pricing Comparison

CodeCover
CodeCover
  • Open Source
Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs