Confluence vs MediaWiki

Struggling to choose between Confluence and MediaWiki? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Confluence is a Office & Productivity solution with tags like wiki, collaboration, project-management.

It boasts features such as Wiki pages for documentation, Rich text editor for formatting content, Permissions to restrict access, Comments and mentions, Attachments and file management, Search and navigation, Templates and blueprints, Integrations with other tools and pros including Intuitive and easy to use interface, Powerful content creation and formatting, Robust permissions and access controls, Seamless collaboration capabilities, Extensive customization options, Scales to large teams and enterprises, Great integration ecosystem.

On the other hand, MediaWiki is a Online Services product tagged with wiki, collaboration, open-source.

Its standout features include Wiki markup for content creation, Version control of pages, Customizable permissions, Multilingual support, Extensible through extensions, WYSISYG and raw HTML editing, Full text search, Categories and tags, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Widely used and supported, Strong community, Highly customizable, Supports large wikis with high traffic, Robust permissions system.

Feature	Confluence	MediaWiki
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Office & Productivity	Online Services

Product Overview

Confluence

Description: Confluence is a popular wiki and collaboration software developed by Atlassian. It allows teams to efficiently collaborate on documents and projects in a central place.

MediaWiki

Description: MediaWiki is a free and open-source wiki software platform written in PHP. It serves as the platform for Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, allowing users to collaboratively create and edit content.

Key Features Comparison

Confluence Features

• Wiki pages for documentation
• Rich text editor for formatting content
• Permissions to restrict access
• Comments and mentions
• Attachments and file management
• Search and navigation
• Templates and blueprints
• Integrations with other tools

MediaWiki Features

• Wiki markup for content creation
• Version control of pages
• Customizable permissions
• Multilingual support
• Extensible through extensions
• WYSISYG and raw HTML editing
• Full text search
• Categories and tags

Pros & Cons Analysis

Confluence

Pros

• Intuitive and easy to use interface
• Powerful content creation and formatting
• Robust permissions and access controls
• Seamless collaboration capabilities
• Extensive customization options
• Scales to large teams and enterprises
• Great integration ecosystem

Cons

• Can be expensive for larger teams
• Steep learning curve for advanced features
• Formatting options not as extensive as full word processor
• Limited workflows and process automation
• Mobile apps lack some functionality
• Can be slow with very large wikis

MediaWiki

Pros

• Free and open source
• Widely used and supported
• Strong community
• Highly customizable
• Supports large wikis with high traffic
• Robust permissions system

Cons

• Steep learning curve for wiki markup
• Potential performance issues on large wikis
• Upgrades can be complex
• Limited WYSIWYG editing features
• No built-in user management system

Pricing Comparison

Confluence

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based

MediaWiki

• Open Source