Cucumber vs JBehave

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Cucumber icon
Cucumber
JBehave icon
JBehave

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Cucumber and JBehave? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cucumber is a Development solution with tags like bdd, testing-framework, plain-language.

It boasts features such as Plain text language (Gherkin) for writing tests, Integration with popular programming languages like Ruby, Java, JavaScript etc, Built-in support for generating test reports, Ability to automate web, mobile, desktop apps, Integration with continuous integration tools, Reusable step definitions, Tags for organizing tests and pros including Improves communication between teams, Tests are readable by non-technical people, Focuses on behavior rather than implementation, Reusable test components, Active open source community.

On the other hand, JBehave is a Development product tagged with bdd, java, jvm, testing-framework.

Its standout features include Allows writing stories/scenarios in natural language using Gherkin syntax, Provides a rich set of matchers for defining steps, Supports data tables for providing example data, Integrates with JUnit for running stories as tests, Generates reports in HTML, XML etc. to document stories, Supports extending framework via Java APIs, and it shines with pros like Promotes collaboration between devs, QA and business analysts, Documentation using stories serves as specifications, Natural language syntax is easy to read and understand, Abstracts away testing code from specifications.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Cucumber and JBehave?

When evaluating Cucumber versus JBehave, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Cucumber and JBehave have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include bdd, testing-framework, plain-language.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Cucumber and JBehave significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include bdd, testing-framework, plain-language.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include bdd, testing-framework and bdd, java.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Cucumber and JBehave. You might also explore bdd, testing-framework, plain-language for alternative approaches.

Feature Cucumber JBehave
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Cucumber
Cucumber

Description: Cucumber is an open source testing framework that supports behavior-driven development (BDD). It allows you to write tests in plain language that describes the behavior of the application, which helps bridge the communication gap between technical and non-technical teams.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

JBehave
JBehave

Description: JBehave is an open source behavior-driven development (BDD) framework for Java and JVM languages. It allows developers to write specifications using natural language and automates the testing process.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber Features
  • Plain text language (Gherkin) for writing tests
  • Integration with popular programming languages like Ruby, Java, JavaScript etc
  • Built-in support for generating test reports
  • Ability to automate web, mobile, desktop apps
  • Integration with continuous integration tools
  • Reusable step definitions
  • Tags for organizing tests
JBehave
JBehave Features
  • Allows writing stories/scenarios in natural language using Gherkin syntax
  • Provides a rich set of matchers for defining steps
  • Supports data tables for providing example data
  • Integrates with JUnit for running stories as tests
  • Generates reports in HTML, XML etc. to document stories
  • Supports extending framework via Java APIs

Pros & Cons Analysis

Cucumber
Cucumber
Pros
  • Improves communication between teams
  • Tests are readable by non-technical people
  • Focuses on behavior rather than implementation
  • Reusable test components
  • Active open source community
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Difficult troubleshooting
  • Slow test execution
  • Brittle tests
  • Hard to scale and maintain large test suites
JBehave
JBehave
Pros
  • Promotes collaboration between devs, QA and business analysts
  • Documentation using stories serves as specifications
  • Natural language syntax is easy to read and understand
  • Abstracts away testing code from specifications
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for BDD concepts and practices
  • More overhead compared to traditional unit testing frameworks
  • Poor IDE support and lack of code completion
  • Limited types of testing supported out of the box

Pricing Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber
  • Open Source
JBehave
JBehave
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs