Cyclic vs GitHub Actions

Struggling to choose between Cyclic and GitHub Actions? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cyclic is a Development solution with tags like api, testing, debugging.

It boasts features such as Send API requests, Import and export collections, Environment and global variables, Code generation, Authentication helpers, Test scripts and pros including Free and open source, Intuitive UI, Powerful functionality, Cross-platform support, Active community.

On the other hand, GitHub Actions is a Development product tagged with automation, cicd, testing, deployment, workflows.

Its standout features include Workflow automation, Built-in CI/CD, Event-driven triggers, Reusable workflows, Flexible environment, GitHub integration, Third-party app integration, Security and access controls, and it shines with pros like Seamless GitHub integration, Flexible and customizable workflows, Large ecosystem of actions and templates, Free for public repositories, Scales to any size project, Built-in secret management, Supports many languages and frameworks.

Feature	Cyclic	GitHub Actions
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Cyclic

Description: Cyclic is an open-source alternative to Postman for API testing and development. It allows developers to easily send requests to test and debug APIs and offers features like variables, collections, environments, and automated tests.

GitHub Actions

Description: GitHub Actions is a continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform that allows you to automate your software development workflows. You can build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub.

Key Features Comparison

Cyclic Features

• Send API requests
• Import and export collections
• Environment and global variables
• Code generation
• Authentication helpers
• Test scripts

GitHub Actions Features

• Workflow automation
• Built-in CI/CD
• Event-driven triggers
• Reusable workflows
• Flexible environment
• GitHub integration
• Third-party app integration
• Security and access controls

Pros & Cons Analysis

Cyclic

Pros

• Free and open source
• Intuitive UI
• Powerful functionality
• Cross-platform support
• Active community

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Less extensions than Postman
• Steeper learning curve than Postman

GitHub Actions

Pros

• Seamless GitHub integration
• Flexible and customizable workflows
• Large ecosystem of actions and templates
• Free for public repositories
• Scales to any size project
• Built-in secret management
• Supports many languages and frameworks

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Can get complex for larger projects
• Limited debugging and troubleshooting
• No official support offered
• Limited to 2000 minutes per month for free tier

Pricing Comparison

Cyclic

• Open Source
• Free

GitHub Actions

• Free
• Open Source