Earthly vs GitHub Actions

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Earthly icon
Earthly
GitHub Actions icon
GitHub Actions

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Earthly and GitHub Actions? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, GitHub Actions is a Development product tagged with automation, cicd, testing, deployment, workflows.

Its standout features include Workflow automation, Built-in CI/CD, Event-driven triggers, Reusable workflows, Flexible environment, GitHub integration, Third-party app integration, Security and access controls, and it shines with pros like Seamless GitHub integration, Flexible and customizable workflows, Large ecosystem of actions and templates, Free for public repositories, Scales to any size project, Built-in secret management, Supports many languages and frameworks.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Earthly and GitHub Actions?

When evaluating Earthly versus GitHub Actions, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Earthly and GitHub Actions have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include build, automation, monorepo.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Earthly and GitHub Actions significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include build, automation, monorepo, caching.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include build, automation and automation, cicd.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Earthly and GitHub Actions. You might also explore build, automation, monorepo for alternative approaches.

Feature Earthly GitHub Actions
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

Description: GitHub Actions is a continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform that allows you to automate your software development workflows. You can build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions Features
  • Workflow automation
  • Built-in CI/CD
  • Event-driven triggers
  • Reusable workflows
  • Flexible environment
  • GitHub integration
  • Third-party app integration
  • Security and access controls

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Pros
  • Seamless GitHub integration
  • Flexible and customizable workflows
  • Large ecosystem of actions and templates
  • Free for public repositories
  • Scales to any size project
  • Built-in secret management
  • Supports many languages and frameworks
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Can get complex for larger projects
  • Limited debugging and troubleshooting
  • No official support offered
  • Limited to 2000 minutes per month for free tier

Pricing Comparison

Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
  • Free
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs