DHTMLX vs Enact

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

DHTMLX icon
DHTMLX
Enact icon
Enact

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between DHTMLX and Enact? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

DHTMLX is a Development solution with tags like ui, widgets, data-visualization.

It boasts features such as UI components for building web apps like grids, forms, charts, calendars, Client-side data loading and manipulation, Reusable modular architecture, Cross-browser support, Touch support for mobile apps, Theming and customization options and pros including Good documentation and examples, Active community support, Open source and commercial licenses available, Good selection of widgets for common tasks, Lightweight size compared to some alternatives.

On the other hand, Enact is a Development product tagged with opensource, crossplatform, web-development, responsive-design.

Its standout features include React-based framework, Supports web and native app development, Adaptive UI components, Theming support, Data binding, Routing, Internationalization, and it shines with pros like Open source, Good documentation, Active community, Cross-platform support, Responsive and adaptive UI, Reusable components.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare DHTMLX and Enact?

When evaluating DHTMLX versus Enact, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

DHTMLX and Enact have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include ui, widgets, data-visualization.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between DHTMLX and Enact significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include ui, widgets, data-visualization.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include ui, widgets and opensource, crossplatform.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between DHTMLX and Enact. You might also explore ui, widgets, data-visualization for alternative approaches.

Feature DHTMLX Enact
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

DHTMLX
DHTMLX

Description: DHTMLX is a JavaScript library for building modern web applications. It provides a set of reusable UI components, data visualization widgets, and tools for rapid development.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Enact
Enact

Description: Enact is an open-source application development framework created by Panasonic to build cross-platform web applications. It allows developers to create adaptive, responsive user interfaces that work across devices.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

DHTMLX
DHTMLX Features
  • UI components for building web apps like grids, forms, charts, calendars
  • Client-side data loading and manipulation
  • Reusable modular architecture
  • Cross-browser support
  • Touch support for mobile apps
  • Theming and customization options
Enact
Enact Features
  • React-based framework
  • Supports web and native app development
  • Adaptive UI components
  • Theming support
  • Data binding
  • Routing
  • Internationalization

Pros & Cons Analysis

DHTMLX
DHTMLX
Pros
  • Good documentation and examples
  • Active community support
  • Open source and commercial licenses available
  • Good selection of widgets for common tasks
  • Lightweight size compared to some alternatives
Cons
  • Steeper learning curve than some other libraries
  • Not as feature-rich as some commercial alternatives
  • Limited support for accessibility
  • Not as popular as some other JS frameworks
Enact
Enact
Pros
  • Open source
  • Good documentation
  • Active community
  • Cross-platform support
  • Responsive and adaptive UI
  • Reusable components
Cons
  • Less popular than alternatives like React Native
  • Limited component library
  • Not as feature-rich as some frameworks
  • Steep learning curve

Pricing Comparison

DHTMLX
DHTMLX
  • Open Source
  • Commercial License
  • Subscription-Based
Enact
Enact
  • Open Source

Get More Information

DHTMLX
DHTMLX
DHTMLX
Learn More About DHTMLX
Enact
Enact
Enact
Learn More About Enact

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Alternatives, made obvious.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal